Comment by
AnchorValue on Dec 13, 2020 4:37pm
i don't think my post was clear, so i'll try again: HE thinks there no upside to the historical resource, and believes there is risk in re-confirming the resrouce WE beleive there is little risk to re-confirming and tremendous upside along the way
Comment by
Chuburashka on Dec 13, 2020 9:46pm
Please outline specifically where's the upside in the next 4-6 months. If you can prove it with facts and not speculation that would be appreciated.
Comment by
bearbike137 on Dec 13, 2020 7:35pm
Mariusz - I am not stating that Taylor Dart is correct with his bearish article. That said, there is no way he is involved in an orchestrated attack. I used to subscribe to his service and he is a fairly serious investor. However, he is usually centered on gold and precious metal stocks. I like and own Oroco - so I hope I don't flamed for this post.
Comment by
AnchorValue on Dec 13, 2020 8:10pm
I agree. I think he took a good look, and the passed based on where valuation is today. He didn't feel he needed to dig deeper.
Comment by
Patriot on Dec 14, 2020 3:09pm
What kind of a Scumbag would do that? Only someone that is in the Know.Could the answer be in the news releases ? HMMMMM
Comment by
twaver on Dec 13, 2020 2:20pm
Yes, the author is free to wait until our massive deposit is perfectly proven and wrapped up in a nice little 43-101 report. He will probably be able to capture the final 30% (buy-out premium). But he'll likely be paying $5/share for the privilege. I prefer to take a little risk based on what is already obvious, and make several hundred percent. To each his own.
Comment by
pullsea on Dec 13, 2020 3:17pm
The author makes some good analytical points. But these will appeal to the skeptics AND to those who might be scheming to bring the price down for their ENTRY. Wondering !!!