Oroco Resource Corp V.OCO

One question to be asked ?

[FrozenInOntario]

From Ceasar report just out.   And remember, Oroco pay these guys.

When we visited the Santo Tomas project in March, hole 4 had just been completed and the geologists seemed to be pretty excited about it. Seeing now how the hole is without any doubt the worst of the three holes assay results were reported on, we are wondering how this discrepancy could be explained. But it once again shows that only lab results should be relied upon, no matter how good the core looks like and no matter what an XRF hand gun tells you.

One of the 3 amigos visiting the site at the same time, the cartographer, tweeted this in april.
The fact that BZ003 and BZ004 appear to have been drilled from the same pad is positive in my mind. Oco has 46 permitted pads in Brasiles. If you had only one rig, would you drill 2x from the same pad if the first try from that pad didn't show something exciting
Saw also that BZ004 was part of the video made by the dancer summarizing his visit.    Trade Fill did not mention anything but got excited over core NZ013 in the core shack if i remember well.  
So I would venture that Oroco reps did push that BZ004 quite a lot to the visitors.
Note the other pictures that looked like geo porn on Oroco Tweeter feed later on.   North Zone 14-15-16 or something like this.
https://twitter.com/OrocoCorp/status/1511197874247254023

Main take away for the future, beware of core porn peddlers.   And as I have read before, beware of junior switching lead geos in their campaign. 
Maybe they strike significant with the latest drills in the NZ, but gee, looking again at these videos, I wonder why they have not publish the assays results yet.

GLTA

[LongTView]

Do keep in mine labs are backed upo from Covid protocols, covid sickness and a huge demand for their services. I am very frustrated at the time from Core to assay resutls as I am sure everyone else is as well. These are not normal times