Post by
FatsDomino on Feb 01, 2022 12:25pm
160 ft onshore vs 170 ft offshore
CGX says it hit 170 feet of reservoir sands in offshore Guyana. Offshore drilling is very expensive. They need more money and they need it now. No idea of the quality of the hydrocarbons in the sands. Is it 3 separate intervals that add up to 170 feet? Water saturated? Lot's of question and lots of money required to answer them. Market cap = over $ 1.2 billion. wow.
XOP hits 160 feet of reservoir sand onshore in oil-friendly Wyoming. In 2 wells: 140 feet of oil in one, 20 feet of oil in the other. Onshore is drilling is much cheaper. Market cap = $ 100 million.
One of these companies is way overvalued. LMAO. DYODD.
Comment by
CLOUDER on Feb 01, 2022 12:30pm
O.M.G. there is no coparison man, pi s poor bashing, lol. you 2 should get a room. but this is a good sign guys the shorters are scared and have hired bashers, a bad one and a subtil one. lol.
Comment by
Dirksidetrack on Feb 01, 2022 1:07pm
170 ft of shale oil in Wyoming maybe produce 4000 bbl/day for a year or so before it starts going to nothing. 100 ft offshore Guyana cranks out over 200,000 bbl/day for 20 years.
Comment by
FatsDomino on Feb 01, 2022 2:18pm
how do you know the size of the reservoirs and flow rates? let alone the quality of the oil/gas. Lots of wild assumptions here that have pumped this up to a $ 1.2 billion market cap. DYODD.
Comment by
FatsDomino on Feb 02, 2022 9:51am
now that the pump is over the company will be trying to do a BIG cash raise here. They need LOTS of cash to continue. That is no secret. Big pump started before the results came in. If the company is lucky, they might get a big pp done near $ 3. But my guess is it will be at less than that.