Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Petromin Resources Ltd. V.PTR.H

"Petromin Resources Ltd is a petroleum and natural gas exploration and production company in Canada. It is focused on its core operations, which include oil and gas producing properties in Alberta, Canada along the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The company owns an interest in Frog Lake area which consists of oil deposits, Gilby Property, Morningside Property, and Redwater North property." see more

TSXV:PTR.H - Post Discussion

Petromin Resources Ltd. > Of interest
View:
Post by easyoasy on May 30, 2018 4:42pm

Of interest

Removal by the Court Outside the ordinary removal powers of the shareholders, there are exceptional circumstances where the courts have exercised their power to remove directors. In Catalyst Fund General Part I Inc. v. Hollinger Inc.[1] the oppression remedy provided for in section 241 of the CBCA was recognized as a statutory basis for the court to remove a director. However, Justice Ground in Albrecht v. Kuhn[2], in refusing to remove a director from a corporation’s board, noted that the court will exercise its power of removal in only the most extraordinary circumstances where the continuation of the board of directors in its present state would be harmful to the corporation or where the conduct of the director rises to the level of misconduct. A summary of cases dealing with circumstances where the judiciary has removed a director of a corporation was set out in Walker v. Betts[3].
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities