Post by
geomanx02 on Sep 07, 2021 5:45pm
#6-2 Well
First off......Bpultra did an excellent job of analysis of the data on the 6-2 well. Rw is the unknow factor but normally, carbonates are oil/gas productive when the water saturation is in the 30 to 35%, or less.
Second, the potentially productive carbonate zone in the #6-2 well is of no interest seeing as if it is oil/gas productive, it will not have sufficient flow rates or reserves required to support the original concept of this "basin play".
Further more, the zone need not be tested (1) due to the above and (2) due to the fact there is no place to dispose of recovered fluids.
RECAF needs to find much larger reservoirs and hopefully the bottom of the #6-2 well or the #6-1 well will provide a glimpse at some huge reservoirs.
Third, there is an obvious unconformity located between the depths of 1100 to 1250 meters in the #6-2 well. Big impact geological event.
Comment by
ZaPhiCa on Sep 07, 2021 8:31pm
Someone gave you thumbs up for this garbage? LOL. Listen to Scot Evans recent interview. You can find it on Reddit and Discord. Huge eye opener. These geos here have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. Great interview.