Post by
pennylane101 on Jul 14, 2022 12:09pm
Just a theory...
There is no rational, economic explanation for the sudden drop in share price since the company has made a tremendous turnaround. My one cyncal view is that the big boys are trying to shake up and clear out the small retail investor who may have purchased shares on margin. As a general rule I never buy on margin. Sorry fellas! ;0) It's a dog eat dog world out there and you gotta protect yourself at all costs. I'm holding long and strong.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 14, 2022 3:27pm
Well, there goes my theory LOL! ;0) I think we've reached the bottom at .85 cents or so. The volume just isn't there to indicate panic selling.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 15, 2022 7:59am
I hold almost 250,000 of the Ret voting shares. My rationale for getting into the voting shares was being burned on the Torstar privatization deal. After that fiasco, I said never again.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 15, 2022 9:29am
Interesting how Fairfax and Prem Watsa were involved to some extent in both Torstar and Reitmans. Torstar shares were driven to the ground in similar fashion.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 15, 2022 10:03am
Wouldn't be surprised if that fu-cker Watsa had something to do with the drop in share price.
Comment by
tomperns on Jul 15, 2022 4:26pm
Didn't Reitmans buy Fairfax's shares at $3/share like 3 yrs ago?
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 16, 2022 8:29am
Doesn't mean he doesn't have his eyes set on Reitmans as a potentional cheap acquistion.
Comment by
savyinvestor333 on Jul 18, 2022 7:06am
I wonder if Canadian Tire would be interested in adding another accretive retailer to the mix. Don't forget how they took in Mark's Work Warehouse and also Sport Chek.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 18, 2022 8:58am
What, are you kidding, Canadian Tire? LOL!
Comment by
savyinvestor333 on Jul 18, 2022 9:53am
No I'm not They have already purchased Mark's Sport Chek and Party City I'm sure we are more profitable than a couple of those chains
Comment by
tomperns on Jul 15, 2022 4:24pm
Same rational for me. If Steven Reitman owns half the voting shares, I want to be pari-passu with him. I'm close to 150k shares. Part of me thinks I have too much (and i'm down nearly 30 percent) and part of me thinks these shares are worth $3 today at the very least.
Comment by
savyinvestor333 on Jul 18, 2022 7:03am
I would think if no dividend was declared as is the current case this is a non issue.
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 18, 2022 8:56am
The non voting shareholders (according to that document) are entitled to a guaranteed 5 cent dividend per year, which must be paid, hence the preferential dividend. If it's missed for 8 quarters then the non voting shares become voting shares. That's my understanding. I dunno. Am I misreading it?
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 18, 2022 12:17pm
Here is the link. Don't know if things have changed since 1998. https://content.reitmanscanadalimited.com/pdf/RCLCertificateArticlesofAmalgamationAugust
Comment by
pennylane101 on Jul 18, 2022 12:21pm
Untitled - Reitmans (Canada) Limite - Reitmans (Canada) Limited The link I posted previously doesn't work for some reason. https://content.reitmanscanadalimited.com › pdf › RCLCer
Comment by
Mephistopheles3 on Jul 18, 2022 12:23pm
Not sure, but I just went into the Annual Information Form filed in 2020 which would have all that info and nothing is disclosed other than they rank pari passu for dividends. So I would go with that there's no option for the non-voting to convert into voting.