Post by
askretka on Mar 18, 2023 1:14pm
This new deposit will be HUGE!!!! And so is potential gains
I mean otherwise why would Barrick have their lawyers try say that a back in agreement terminated in December 2022 for other properties outside OKO is still valid??
Barrick has no claims to the rich OKO deposit from what I can understand they terminated their interest in OKO years ago.
CEO said in last quarterly and webcast that two other properties outside OKO hold a lot of promise. Then BARRICK trys to say back in agreement terminated in December 2022 by Reunion should still be valid.
BARRICK might as well try I guess but Reunion says they will fight it and it has no merit.
It's the biggest new gold find in the last 10 years at least from reading I've done.
Barrick wouldn't be trying this frivolous lawsuit unless there are really huge numbers at stake here for one of the world's biggest gold mining companies. Cheers!!!!!