Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

SORRY GIRLS.....

[crappot]

Never Got Your Pump from BRUCE, He Sold Last Pump....

[theinvestor22]

IMHO, Bruce Campbell's sole role in the drama is to bring eyeballs to the story.  Whether or not he's buying, selling or holding isn't relevant to me.

[lscfa]

  .  He never sold, lying jackass.... https://www.purposeinvest.com/funds/purpose-canadian-equity-growth-fund

[Humanist]

don't mess with iscfa's information lol. .... no one beats his research .. glta

[teeswater]

That is a fact, I have followed Iscfa for years, as his/her DD is always reliable,  I would also add Lifeboat and Investor22 and Salilorman to the most informative posters list, as I read the CEO board daily as well, just dont have an alias on that board, but nonetheless, dont need one to read the valuable information these posters provide. Just very thankful to you all.

[3burtc]

Renember as a kid your mother telling you that if you make a nasty face it could stay that way. Well the same goes for kissing someone's a$$.

[teeswater]

mmm...okay, I have no association with any of these alias's, but I think they should know they are appreciated and I encourage them to continue posting relevant information. Not "kissing their a$$es" at all,  expressing gratitude. Try it sometime, you might find it soul cleansing

[3burtc]

Gratitude for trying to panic investors with misleading information on Q4? That wasn't very nice was it?

[Lifeboat1]

Teeswater, I appreciate the comments on myself but I have to disagree with you on IFSCA.  I think his older posts were more informative and his financial analysis is always interesting but he more often than not now just throws out negative posts about the industry that I have pointed out on a number of accaisions are misleading or wrong with respect to Reliq.  I have no problem with

[ol_griz]

I can't say I understand what it is you disagree with.  Is the research wrong, or not?  Many investors care about responsible and transparent management communication as much or more than current numbers and forecasts.  On that score Lisa has deserved her tenure in the doghouse.  The question is only when the company deserves to come out of it.  That's the gamble -

[Lifeboat1]

Ol_griz You can go back and look at my posts if you are interested.  I will just mention when he went on and on about co-pays and how no one would use the service because of copays despite the fact that most Medicare recipients don't pay copays and there are at least hundred of thousands to millions of patients on these programs that are paying copays.

[lscfa]

Lifeboat, shove it.... https://www.chartspan.com/news/the-ccm-problem-that-no-one-wants-to-talk-about/  

[SupremeNed]

reliq does not have these issues. nice try

[3burtc]

The only issue Reliq has is that it's an $8 stock trading at a dollar.

[qwerty22]

You've seen the patient churn numbers?  

[Lifeboat1]

IFSCA - You realize that Reliq supplies CCM services as well as RPM.  Even if the article you posted...again... ...then Reliq can still provide CCM services.  So is your argument that Reliq may provide more CCM than RPM services due to some patients having to pay a copay or is it that no one will use the services become some have to pay a copay despite the fact that we know people are

[qwerty22]

Is adding new codes the solution to this problem?  

[Lifeboat1]

Qwerty22 I think you missed the point of my post.  There is no problem due to copays.  You don't add more codes if the original codes are not being used. Yes, some people will decline the service due to copays or may choose to only be on RPM or CCM but as I said the majority of Medicare recipients don't pay a copay for these services so it is a non-issue.  I am sure Reliq

[aaaaaargh]

I can't like your post enough . Iscfa calls it like it is and will always provide links. He is 10 times the poster than that of a pumper only with blinders on.

[3burtc]

I see, is ica getting ready to bash Q1 results? Shocker!