Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

Ask yourself

[Mitch43]

Why the lack of enthusiasm on sp to any new signed contract?!

[qwerty22]

That Q was asked and answered a while back. The focus now is on the bottlenecks and if resolving those will move the business on.  

[Mitch43]

Reliq :  Announces New Contract with a Large US Health Plan Didn't even succeed slowing the sp downward from 0.66 to 0.50 CAD we shareholders ( the CO owners) should demand the CO  provide basic details on all signed contracts instead of  unverifiable vague announcements.

[qwerty22]

Nope. What they do seems standard for this sort of thing. Frustratingly vague is the norm.  

[Mitch43]

Seems, obviously not good enough! this needs to be changed!

[qwerty22]

You need some perspective. Each one of these contracts is not a business redefining action, why should the market react. They are best seen as the day-to-day activity of the company. In many circumstances the equivalent activity from another business would not even make it into a press release. All they are really doing is showing their ability to execute on one key aspect of the business

[Mitch43]

I think  you misunderstood what I meant by basic details... what I'm asking for is just the precise location and name  of the CO/clients  Reliq signs a contract with, in order for us to check if they are real in the first place. Reliq signed contracts with anonymous clients in Californis, Texas etc. is not good enough at least to me, and needs to be corrected.

[Lifeboat1]

They are not going release the name of every doctor practice.  If they did crazy investors would call everyone of them as they did in the past.  If you are a doctor's office you don't want your staff wasting their time answering calls from investors from one of your vendors.   if you don't believe or trust the Company you should not invest in them.

[qwerty22]

This has already been explained to him. At this point you have to think it's either beyond his understanding or he's wilfully putting out FUD.  

[Mitch43]

Yes, I fully understood it, but unfortunately I'm entitled to express my opinions as well...  " willfully  putting out FUD"  Don't be ridiculous, I'm holding a relatively large position. If I am highly concerned it's because I am rightly/wrongly pessimistic based on the present SP value to the point of selling out... Yep, but selling to who ?!  in the

[Mitch43]

The drawback from your opinion ( different from the one once given by the CEO) about NR  on contracts is the obvious fact more and more shareholders don't pay attention to them... while I remember 2-3yrs ago when such NR tended to give some boost to the SP.. Plus I don't need lessons from you on how to invest my money in the stock market.... I'm still doing fine overall after

[EdinColorado]

Because the past optimism of new contracts and Lisa overpromising on events that would produce a very quick rise in SP are tempered now by the reality that new contracts are events that have translated to a painfully slow rise in SP.