Post by
Reggie1 on Oct 03, 2023 3:52am
Close 10% below financing price
Looks like the market is on management again with the funds needed for the growth to come. From Scott it appears these funds are needed for onboarding growth to come as the growth is really going to kick off this year.
Anyone ever see a company with such growth and then funds raised for said growth get smoked to new 52 week lows?
All I can do is repeat...management has no clue how money flows into the company timeline wise....and no clue consequently how to make the market understand via communication. They do not understand their business model.
Over years of operations.
Comment by
Peggy123 on Oct 03, 2023 9:44am
Are you aware the TSX has been down triple digits 6 out of the last 11 days,the V.TSX Venture down double digits more then 6 days,I dont know about your Venture portfolio is doing but mines getting WHACKED. Papi
Comment by
EdinColorado on Oct 03, 2023 2:16pm
A lot of stocks' prices are based on perception. Imagine for a moment how this stock's health would be perceived if we had experienced no projections of NASDAQ listing, zero deadlines for stock buybacks, and just experienced quietly doing the grunt work needed to grow the company. This company is getting sunk by low credibility made by the CEOs own irresponsible rhetoric.
Comment by
Upsdowns on Oct 04, 2023 11:10am
It really doesn't matter becaaause Friday's close will be 10% higher. Oh and don't forget to pick up your Costco pumpkin pie! Sunday is the last day for them, they are to die for with French vanilla ice cream, yum!
Comment by
lscfa on Oct 04, 2023 12:12pm
No 4 month hold period on this financing. There might be selling pressure for months on the stock as new holders sell to hold the warrant for next to no cost.
Comment by
Upsdowns on Oct 04, 2023 12:46pm
So iscafa, I'm kinda stumped by your statement. If there was a four month hold period, wouldn't they be able to sell after the four months had past? I'm not sure what the difference would be other than four months.
Comment by
lscfa on Oct 04, 2023 12:52pm
Bloody trader scum don't want to tie up funds for 4 months. If they can buy and sell immediately for a free warrant they still have their funds to trade other stocks.
Comment by
lscfa on Oct 04, 2023 1:07pm
The no holding period also makes you wonder if the hedge funds lined up by PI Financial did not want to be holding this stock when the financials hit the fan on October 30.
Comment by
Upsdowns on Oct 04, 2023 2:09pm
PI Financial has been with Reliq since 2018, but they can't wait to sell right now? Are you sure you know what you're talking about? Seriously, do you think they are retarded or something?
Comment by
lscfa on Oct 04, 2023 2:53pm
https://www.cantechletter.com/2019/03/pi-financial-suspends-coverage-of-reliq-health-technologies/
Comment by
Lifeboat1 on Oct 04, 2023 3:04pm
Well it seems PI has come around to see the light at the end of the tunnel. It would look bad for them if they didn't do their DD after what they went through in the past.
Comment by
Upsdowns on Oct 04, 2023 3:41pm
Lifeboat1, they were extremely bullish way back then and Reliq only had 10 000 patients at the time. I bet PI is licking there chops wondering if Christmas came early. Friday .40, .50, .60 or higher? Omg I better watch out because I might be labeled a pumper lol. Happy Thanksgiving giving, I'm taking off for the weekend, but first grabbing a couple of those pies.
Comment by
Lifeboat1 on Oct 04, 2023 4:22pm
I do think we start to see upward momentum after the close as the institutional investors hold their shares and everyone who couldn't get in buys whil it is low including all the shorts. If they come up with positive news at the end of the month this is off to the races.
Comment by
EdinColorado on Oct 04, 2023 5:19pm
Well, maybe they do have a better chance of getting out from underwater than most small caps that recently gave their investors the private placement booby prize. Nice to hear some hopeful optimism anyway.
Comment by
Mitch43 on Oct 04, 2023 3:19pm
Thanks for this posting which proves one more time to Reliq' affiliated pumper/ apologist, Lifeboat1-Mingzhu, that he can't deny Reliq was forced to restate some of its 2018 financials nor that the Co was penalized for its misrepresentations 2.5 millions.
Comment by
Lifeboat1 on Oct 04, 2023 4:19pm
Again Reliq has never restated revenue. In 2018 they moved properly recognized revenue into bad debt and wrote it off. While to some that may seem like the same thing there is a big difference from a liability stand point.
Comment by
EdinColorado on Oct 05, 2023 10:43am
But they covered Reliq in 2021 & 2023. So, what's the purpose of the barrage of posts like this here?