Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

What's the real reason?

[Upsdowns]

She has to tell us the reason for not filing. Putting out a vague reason with no explanation is unacceptable. Btw, how is it that people like iscfa know in advance what the news release is? I hope regulators take a look at all the questionable videos with investment pitch media, especially the one about the short attack. SHE HAS TO TELL US WHAT THE COMPANY IS UP TO, because it's tied to the financials. Record breaking earnings and that is what she gives us?

[Reggie1]

I like the comment from Scott.  They do a financing and it turns the accounting department upsided down and they can't process things in time. Good one to the point of laughable.   Keep in my it you will find the financing at the end of the Quarterly report under "subsequent events" Cause its not going to be accounted for in the period reported regardless. 

[Mitch43]

Reality check for you...Reliq is not even a real health care CO , the  Iugo platform is just a fake concoction built by PHD dr Lisa Crossley out of smokes and mirrors...Don't take my words for it,Do your own DD on the subject starting by googling  the Thindal brothers trial by the BCSEC.

[Lifeboat1]

Good words Mitch.  Do your own DD.  Who is more credible Cognizant who their CEO mentioned Reliq as a future revenue driver along with Humana an 8 billion dollar US healthcare provider and small Companies like digiiMed in Puerto Rico , Dr. Ezeugwu from John's Hopkins who have worked with Reliq for a few years and have provided quotes and interviews or Mitch who brings up something

[Bucketshop]

And the stock continues to tumble. How much of this PIG has Cognizant or any company purchased?? Classic pump and Dump!!

[Mitch43]

Blah bla bla... Provide instead credible proofs for all what you are mentioning, for starterThe Cognizant lie of being a reliq partner ( checkable on 2 of Lisa Interviews on Youtube) is solely based on the fact Reliq has been a Cognizant client... So debunked. All the other names you are throwing out without any details about their real connections with Reliq proves nada. FYI, the controling

[kusio1]

To be fair, people still invested in this company are incapable of critical thinking, that's why the company manages to lead them on and dilute for so long

[Peggy123]

Member since  TODAY   GET LOST

[Lifeboat1]

Those of you who are upset with the filing delay and reason for it and are calling the Regulators for an investigation clearly don't understand that Reliq would have filed this extension with the Regulators and received approval for it including the reason stated in the press release.  What is laughable is that you are complaining to the same people who approved it.

[Mitch43]

From the regular Reliq affiliated pumper and Lisa apologist posting under different profile on this board...always defending the indefensible lies from the CO.... Priceless!!!

[Tropicalsun]

Lifeboat1, I believe you are bang on with this post. However from a company stand point why not be transparent and tell share holders that they will be late in filing before the fact, instead of after. At the very least, it does show some respect for shareholders and everyone knows this ceo has a very poor track record of being transparent, no one should argue that fact.

[Lifeboat1]

I don't disagree.  I assume the late communications was because they didn't have the Regulatory approval until yesterday or they thought they could get it done on time but still had some items to finish at the deadline.

[Tropicalsun]

Funny thing about assumptions, they leave people to speculate reason's. One could assume that much work is still needed based on the November 14th date in the press release, we shall see. On a side note, you already know that Mitch43 is a blow fish. He could have sold his phantom large position over $.60 cents and left all the stress behind. We can only assume as to the reason's why he

[Reggie1]

Assumptions? You jest. There is a history here and there is no need to assume other than to assume to the negative and destructive because there is no history of the opposite.  Wake up right. I mean to try and pull anything positive out of this growth story gone awry is like trying to pull a toothpick out of a blackhole. Seriously.  Everyone here with a negative view has volumes to

[Lifeboat1]

Reggie1 - Stop posting misinformation.  The history is 2 audits from KPMG and last year's audit was late and it was a nothing burger despite all the speculation of massive write-off.  What you are claiming about events subsequent to June 30th not being audited is not true and other posters have posted actual information that show otherwise as well as the Regulators approving their

[Mitch43]

From the poster who was caught twice posting misinformations using different profiles without any particular reasons other than pump the stock or provide apologies for CEO dr Lisa Crossley... and thus lost all credibility, PRICELESS!!!

[Tropicalsun]

Reggie1, not following you on this post. Most likely because I think you missunderstood mine, transparency is a word ceo Lisa and the board of directors clearly doesn't understand, don't know if they ever will.

[francoisl13]

Agree with you Tropicalsun but, for those who knows Reliq, it is well known that they are not realistic nor transparent. Let's hope that they get their act together sooner than later...