Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

compare

[lscfa]

Crossley is incompetent.   



Accuhealth

We ship devices to patients using tracking numbers, and once the device has arrived, we call the patient to onboard them onto the program. We help them take their first measurement and make sure that their data is flowing appropriately into our platform. Some vendors require the clinic staff to train patients on device usage.




Reliq

One of the things that we've learned that I found very interesting when our care managers started reaching out to patients who are not adherent, so once we contacted the existing clients and gotten permission to contact the patients about adherence, it turned out -- in a large number of the cases, the issue is that the patient had received the hardware, it might have been 6 or 9 months previously but were still waiting for a call for their -- from their doctor to teach them how to use the unit or even just tell them, okay, you should start collecting your data and I'll be checking in on you.

[SISBOOMBAH]

Accuheath CEO Stephen Samson was once an employee of Reliq.  On December 10, 2018,  Reliq announced the departure of Mr. Stephen Samson, who was originally hired by the Company’s former Chief Visionary Officer to take on the role of CIO. According to Accuhealth's web page, Accuhealth has over 100,000 unique patients using their platform. I wonder if Reliq would have done

[Reggie1]

Its shows the culture of RHT and the ego of the now properly discharged CEO. The only way to survive as an employee at RHT was to suck up to Lisa and go with the program of delusion. You end up with a bunch of shleps marching off a cliff. 

[theinvestor22]

A couple of points: 1. Samson as I recall was part of a group that Reliq sued because of alleged fraud, theft, extortion and sabotage.  Without an admission of guilt, Reliq was paid I think $400k to settle these allegations.  I don't think keeping those former employees around would have helped the company. 2. Given the above, my confidence level in anything on the website you

[kusio1]

Well, Reliq paid 2.5mln to settle another lawsuite. Given that, your confidence level in anything the company says should be even lower than Accuhealth. And you actually have proof of Reliq lying multiple times. What gives?

[Lifeboat1]

That lawsuit was a direct result of the activities of the fraudulent employees that the Company got rid of as I22 pointed out.

[kusio1]

No, the lawsuit was a result of lies from Lisa. On financials, on NRs that she signed.  Whether you believe that she was given NRs and was simply too stupid to know that they aren't true, or whether you believe as the court documents say that she was installed and controlled by pump and dump orchestrators, both are equally damning

[Whynottoday]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[SISBOOMBAH]

At a December 4, 2018 meeting, Defendants Samson and Deveros told Reliq CEO Lisa Crossley (“CEO Crossley”) that they were resigning from Reliq, and terminating the contractor relationship, respectively, due to the deceitful behavior of CEO Crossley and other Reliq officers and directors in misleading the investing public about Reliq’s true state of affairs. They also told her that they intended to

[Whynottoday]

Good post....Sisboom This whole company was set up as a scam from the first place. How it lasted this long is beyond me, other than having dumb investors like investor22 keeping it alive.  Avoid this stock at all cost!!!! IMO

[kusio1]

Imho there is no way those who are bullish on the company aren't simply paid to promote it. You can't be that clueless and gullible for free

[SISBOOMBAH]

To be fair Samson was accused of  1) using Reliq's brand name iUGO or IUGO care. 2) promoting, selling or using software that bears the iUGO name. 3) using, marketing selling or using software code that is based on software owned by Reliq.

[Lifeboat1]

And despite those claims they paid $400k and the regulators cleared the company of any wrong doing. 

[Mitch43]

Untrue, the CO CEO  ended up paying 2.5 millions when it had never even made 2.5 millions profits before in its history....after Lisa had pledged first to vigorously challenge what she referred as false allegations. Later she stated that out of court negotiated payment wasn't worth her time working to grow the CO. which still claims in all NR to be a fast growing one erroneously. 

[Lifeboat1]

Mitch - You can make all the unsubstantiated claims you want.  I am just providing the facts for investors who actually look at them.  What is written in the class action settlement document is not my opinion it is the legal view of the class action lawyer under penalty of perjury. 

[Mitch43]

Ahem, are you trying to infer, Lisa never paid 2.5 million... that it was just a gift from the generosity of her heart ?!...

[Lifeboat1]

Mitch - Unlike you I just post the facts and let people make their own investment decisions.  The Company did pay $2.5 million to settle the class action of which Inthink $2 million came from insurance and $400k from ex employees.  The point of my post is even the opposing counsel said in filings to the court that their case was weak and there was a high likley hood that they would not

[aaaaaargh]

Geegus Christmas, do some god damn due diligence.  It took me 2 seconds to find out insurance didn't cover 2 million.   Stop spreading misinformation you clown.....https://www.reliqhealth.com/2022/01/21/reliq-health-technologies-inc-announces-settlement-of-proposed-class-action/

[Lifeboat1]

Which is why I said I think as opposed to saying I know.  

[kusio1]

Fake news. The insurance wasn't 2mln.  Your posts are as accurate as Reliq's NRs and financial statements. Lisa lies, Lifeboat lies, no wonder both are failing (well, the company is, she made out like a (notabene) bandit with salaries and related-party transactions))

[Lifeboat1]

I see that no one is commenting on the facts which is the purpose of my posts that opposing counsel said their case was weak.  I agreed they paid the settlement. The breakout isn't really that important. As usual the bashers try to change the subject when they are wrong.

[kusio1]

The company was set up as pump and dump. The CEO was installed and controlled by pump and dumpers. The NRs CEO signed off were fake and untrue. The ex-CEO and current advisor is pathological liar as proven by the NRs and presentations she put out. They had to pay 2.5mln to settle that case They aren't collecting They aren't capable of putting out financials. Those are all facts. The

[Whynottoday]

Lifeboat.....the fact is, the stock is 20cents nd halted. The facrt is it was started as a pump and dump andnot a real business. Face it, you lost your shirt, so give it up, so oter poriential investors have a true picture of reality.  Shake you head and wake up. YOU HAVE BEEN HAD!!! 

[Lifeboat1]

Whynototday - How have I been had.  I knew what I was investing in and was prepared to lose most of my investment to potentially make 10x+.  I have not lost my shirt.  I am down less than 50% at this point but I expect the Company to trade once the filings are complete and for the stock to do well in the long term.  If it doesn't I am fine with that because I only invested

[Mitch43]

The major problem with you Lifeboat is that you lost all your credibility a long time ago.

[Whynottoday]

Lifeboat...your investment skills are suspect and you ignored all the red flags and continue to do so, You fell in love with this stock, drank all the koolaid and will continue to defend it until you go down with the ship. Not to bright. IMO Sorry for your losses....

[Lifeboat1]

Whynottoday - Don't be sorry for my paper losses.  If I end up actually down Incan afford the loss unlike you from the amount you post and how emotional your posts are.

[Whynottoday]

Now you sound desperate.  Anyway...I guess you learned nothing from your loss. Too bad... GLTA

[Mitch43]

Ahem, however, Whynottoday, unlike you isn't posting on this board under different profiles which I like to remind you is not allowed in the first place by Stockhouse...So why should we believe anything you are telling us? you are the one who shot his credibility....That is another big fact!!!

[Lifeboat1]

Mitch - You can keep claiming all the reasonable posters are the same person does not make it true.  I only post under one name.  Any reasonable person can tell the the people you claim are all the same person are clearly different people.  Keep on with the misinformation.

[Whynottoday]

Dear Stockhouse this company RHT was set up as a pump and dump and now before the BCSC. Please don't say I defamed anyone and I am also expressing my opinion, which I have every right to do. In my opnion, by you supressing this information you are promoting a stock without allowing potiential investors having eccess to all information. So stop it!!! Link to BCSC case now before the courts

[Lifeboat1]

Whynottoday - You do see that the Company is not named in that because they were cleared of any involvement since no one in management sold any shares.  You need the dump for a pump and dump.  It is not illegal to promote and even over promote the Company as long as you do not profit from that over promotion.

[Mitch43]

Please Lifeboat, stop forcing us to laugh at your comment, the 2017-18 pump and dump is alleged by the BCSEC to have netted 19 million cad for the perpetrators which Lisa had to be complicit since she signed off the finns A Thindal presented to her.

[kusio1]

She also signed off on all fake NRs. It is also mentioned in court documents that CEO (Lisa) was INSTALLED and CONTROLLED by the pump and dumpers. It's right there in the paper.

[Lifeboat1]

5 years.  That is how old long ago this happened.  She got rid of the CFO and Core Capital. While they may have hired her once they crossed the line she fired them.  They haven't been involved in the Company for 5 years.  If she were complicit why isn't she listed as one of the defendants.  Not only are you innocent until proven guilty but she and the Company

[kusio1]

Not true. Most recent investor presentation also had fake, backward-looking numbers. The behavior hasn't changed since 5 years ago. It's not a surprise, since Lisa is the CEO installed and CONTROLLED by the pump and dumpers, not ex-employees. So no wonder things haven't changed. The company continues to be exactly the same company as it was, under the same leadership, and set up for

[Mitch43]

According to the BCSEC, The Thindal brothers and associates are the the ones  who acquired the controlling shares of Moseda technologies meanibg they were de facto the owners of the CO,  which they renamed Reliq, and installed Lisa as CEO not the opposite. "Hello, this is Bing. I can confirm that Moseda Health Care was renamed Reliq Health Technologies in 2017" they are

[Lifeboat1]

Mitch - Do you understand how public companies work?  Core Capital may have had a controlling interest in the Company in 2015 but did not  by 2018.  Even as a controlling investor the Board and CEO can still fire the CFO and any external companies providing services.  The recourse for a controlling shareholder is to elect a new board.

[Mitch43]

What you fail to understand is how the CO was set up from day one as a pump and dump by the thindals and associates ( presently on trial) instead of a real health care one. The thindals couldn't care less about health care that's the reason they installed Lisa as CEO, so yes the CEO  can fire the CFO and decide to annul its contract with Core Capital, however since the thindal and

[Lifeboat1]

Mitch - Again you are showing you don't know how public companies work.  The CEO can't fire a board member.  A board member can be removed by a majority of the board.

[Lifeboat1]

If Beukeman were involved he would have been named in the current allegations and hearimg by BCSC.  Since he is not you are disparaging people without any evidence.

[Mitch43]

Lifeboat, " If Beukeman were involved...) Beukeman was a Thindal associate who came on the Reliq board at the same time as A.thindal (reliq CFO up to 2018) hence some could infer without proof  it was for a reason.... You probably never heard about strawpeople (  though I doubt it),to hide/cover the real identity of some business people in shaddy deals. ( Donal Trump comes to

[Lifeboat1]

I understand that it appears that Core Capital was involved in multiple pump and dump schemes.  That does not mean the companies they were involved in were not real companies.  All it means is that they worked to inflate the company value and profited off that.  It does not mean they are not real companies with real value. Reliq is clearly a real company with real customers and

[kusio1]

Reliq is not a real company, as subsequent 5 years have proven. Not surprise since CEO was installed and CONTROLLED by pump and dumpers, and acts exactly like pump and dumpers would expect her to - putting up fake NRs, fake numbers. It continues to happen to this day. Again, can you state, that you are not paid for promoting this garbage, and the nonsense that you are spewing actually comes from

[Lifeboat1]

Kusio1 - So you don't refute any of the true statements I posted that support they are a real company you just go back to something that happened 5-7 years ago and repeat the same thing over and over even though the Comapny has been cleared and is not involved in the current hearing.

[aaaaaargh]

Cool.   Now how do feel about the misinformation you were spreading?

[Mitch43]

What Kusio mean is Reliq is not a real heath care CO but still a pump and dump one...... I concur. , in my opinion it will be demonstrated when the 23 finns will be released., ( incidently just like the 2022 were) Though presently hypothetical, what if some of the 6  individuals presently on trial By the BCSEC  might implicate Lisa somehow  for their defense. after all she signed

[kusio1]

You never made any true statements. Not even in this post.   I am not going back to 5-7 years ago. I am talking about CURRENT lawsuit. Talking about a pump and dumper CONTROLLED and installed CEO that was still a CEO a month ago and is now an advisor. Talking about pump and dump scheme of a company that puts out fake NRs, including as recently as last 2 months, puts out fake investor

[lscfa]

wow, contradicted yourself in same paragraph..... lifeboat:"Unlike you I just post the facts and let people make their own investment decisions.  The Company did pay $2.5 million to settle the class action of which Inthink $2 million came from insurance and $400k from ex employees.  The point of my post is even the opposing counsel said in filings to the court that their case

[Mitch43]

Thank you for aknowledging after several denials that she paid 2.5 millioncad as a fact! Though I should add the payment was indirectly fron shareholders. If she had to use her money she would probably have challenged it  in court. While at it, give us a valid reason as to why you always defended the CO and exCEO.... even when it looks like Lisa lied repeatedly,  and the SP is getting

[Lifeboat1]

More misinformation from Mitch.  I have never claimed the company did not pay 2.5 million to settle the lawsuit as it is a fact unlike what you post.  I see you have responded to the fact that opposing counsel said in court filings that they had a weak case and were not likley to succeed at trial. I am not defending the Company.  I am just provding facts to counter misinformation

[Lifeboat1]

Actually if you read the final settlement document from the class action lawyers their entire case was based on the Oct 16th PR where Reliq said they were restating revenue and then 2 weeks later filed financials and clarified that they were not restating revenue but would move revenue into bad debt and that all revenue was properly recognized and the class action lawyers admitted their case was

[kusio1]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Whynottoday]

Lifeboat....That NR is a pile of BS just like all the other NR's at that time and lying pumps since..  Don't be so foolish.  Those former employees settled because they couldn't afford the legal fees. IMO They should sue the company now that the trurth is out. IMO You stlll have blinders on even though now the full extent of the pump and dump is known and now before the

[Lifeboat1]

Whynottoday - Just like your your incorrect claims on chronicly ill patient life span I am not referring to a NR but a legal document filed with the court.  You really need to do some DD or at least read other posts before responding.

[Mitch43]

Lifeboat is just one of the profiles he uses to post on this board. however what gives him under any aliases,... is like I22 , Mingzhu, Querty they constantly post to pump the stock, or findings excuses for the CO while extolly all the lies propagated by the management.

[kusio1]

Yep, there is no denying it. NRs being put out were fake. Numbers given in investor presentations were fake (just as a reminder, presentation dated Feb 2023 had revenue run rate as of December 2022 at 2mln per month - we all know what it actually was from financials. Multiple mentions of cash flow positive - all fake. The CEO lied, repeatedly. Lifeboat' defense that she was just stupid and

[Mitch43]

damn typos from wireless keyboard: finding, extolling...

[aaaaaargh]

When all those previous employees left the company.....why do you think that is?   It's mostly likely that they saw the potential in this industry and recognized the incompetence running the show, and figured that they could do a much better job...... company

[Humanist]

i am in the camp of yes there is incompetence for sure but reliq'a problems is more than incompetence. if it was only incompetence, you change personnel, and things get better if you truly have a solid business. but i think there is too much bs in their NR overpromising and under delivering, calling contracts contracts when there is no revenue, onboarding or anyhting to be considered solid