Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum RESERVOIR MINERALS INC V.RMC

"Reservoir Minerals Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Serbia, Cameroon, Gabon, Macedonia and Romania."

TSXV:RMC - Post Discussion

RESERVOIR MINERALS INC > Map scale issue
View:
Post by 7heSpeculator on Dec 06, 2013 8:48am

Map scale issue

Hi All,
has anyone else noticed that on the Timok collar plan the distance between hole 1216 and 1213 is approx 500m, but when you look at the section it is closer to 350m
Also on the section B-B' hole 1344 is shown at a shallower angle than on the collar table they provide, closer to 50degrees rather than the stated 56, as it is slightly off section you'd expect it to be steeper, not shallower.
i realise that these are generic and for basic illustration purposes, but this is quite a big difference.

Regards

TS
Comment by cd673 on Dec 07, 2013 10:27am
It looks like about 350m to me in both the first two slides of the drill plan, and the cross sections later in the deck.   Either way I'm sure the data the analysts are using is accurate. +/- some percent of acuracy course.  What do the sizing estimates from Scotia and others say their variance may be?
Comment by 7heSpeculator on Dec 09, 2013 1:41pm
Hmmm, Not too sure, on the plan that i see, slide two for example, the 100m scale bar is definitly not measuring the distance as 350m. Also there is a clear discrepancy between the distances between holes FMTC1213 and 1223 and FMTC1223 and 1210 on sections D-D' and C-C'.  The vertical scales are the same, 100m depth lines, but the horizontal distances are very different. I have sent a ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities