Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum RESERVOIR MINERALS INC V.RMC

"Reservoir Minerals Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Serbia, Cameroon, Gabon, Macedonia and Romania."

TSXV:RMC - Post Discussion

RESERVOIR MINERALS INC > Shouldn't arguments be judged base on its own merit?
View:
Post by vaeirrr1 on Jun 15, 2016 2:05pm

Shouldn't arguments be judged base on its own merit?

So new posters' opinions = automatic junk
Anyone favouring the NSU deal = automatic junk again
People who hold large poisitions and happen to have the same view as you do = the truth

I would think each argument or counter arguments should be judged based on their own merit and not by how much stock the poster holds, when he/she started posting, and what their position is on the vote...

If anyone of the No group is in Toronto, I would be happy to show you how many shares of RMC I own and that I own zero NSU shares... should that somehow make the points I made More valid and convincing?....
Be the first to comment on this post