Post by
vaeirrr1 on Jun 15, 2016 2:05pm
Shouldn't arguments be judged base on its own merit?
So new posters' opinions = automatic junk
Anyone favouring the NSU deal = automatic junk again
People who hold large poisitions and happen to have the same view as you do = the truth
I would think each argument or counter arguments should be judged based on their own merit and not by how much stock the poster holds, when he/she started posting, and what their position is on the vote...
If anyone of the No group is in Toronto, I would be happy to show you how many shares of RMC I own and that I own zero NSU shares... should that somehow make the points I made More valid and convincing?....