Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Replicel Life Sciences Inc V.RP

Alternate Symbol(s):  REPCF

RepliCel Life Sciences Inc. is a Canada-based regenerative medicine company. The Company is focused on developing cell therapies for aesthetic and orthopedic conditions, including aging/sun-damaged skin, pattern baldness, and chronic tendon degeneration. The Company’s cell therapy product pipeline is comprised of RCT-01 for tendon repair, RCS-01 for skin rejuvenation, and RCH-01 for hair... see more

TSXV:RP - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Ingiboy on Oct 19, 2023 10:24am

Confusion

What was lost in this Arbitration Judgement ? 

 It would be nice to get some better detail of the Arbitration proceeding and ruling.  The shareholders never really received any information regarding what Replicel's case was against Shiseido and vica versa

Here is really all we were told as the Arbitration claim was submitted Oct. 18th 2021 by Replicel from Acceswire:
"After several unsuccessful attempts to settle the dispute, RepliCel has filed an arbitration claim seeking Shiseido's full compliance with the agreement or return of the license and all collaboration data and innovations related to its cell therapy treatment for male and female pattern hair loss."

  According to Andrew's N/R Oct. 16th:
  "The tribunal dismissed RepliCel's claims finding that Shiseido validly terminated the collaboration and technology transfer agreement dated effective as of July 9, 2013".

What does this all mean?   Obviously Shiseido can pursue this hair treatment technology without restriction or impedement in Asia and does not have to transfer any Trial data to Replicel.  
The question for me here is does this give Shiseido exclusive rights in Asia or can Replicel also pursue it's own marketing of RCH-01 in Asia?  I would assume they can.

This screams out for an update from Andrew and Jamie as to what is the plan moving forwar in this regard.
Be the first to comment on this post