Radient Technologies Inc V.RTI.H

i wish

[bbuddwisserr104]

i was a patent lawyer that has read through canopy's approved patent  and the expired 1984 co2 extraction patent and gw's extraction process  so like everyone else on this board i can't predict an out come of a trial but can't see canopy wasting money on something without spending a lot of time getting it right imo

[lscfa]

Canopy has been frivilous with other expenditures. Why not risk a few million dollars in hopes of getting a big payoff from GW? The patent only has 1.5 years left. 

[lscfa]

p.s. Canopy has $1.7 billion in cash.....

[bbuddwisserr104]

ishould add it was bruce linton that bought the german company  changed the name before he sold out with a sunset clause which no onesknows what that is except him and constellations brands . my money's on a canopy win or a lic agreement before court if so every other company using co2 will need to  except acb and peace natural cronos after altria buys acb

[lscfa]

Reviewing the documentation between the applicant and the patent office (see link below) reveals some things of interest.   The patent application was rejected by the US patent office multiple times between 2014 and 2020. The applicant kept submitting amendments and arguments why the patent should be allowed. An amended version of the patent was finally allowed based in part on the

[lscfa]

Why was US patent application 14/276,165 even filed in 2014 when US patent 8,895,078 already existed?    14/276,165 was filed with the same claims that were approved in 8,895,078 but the resulting US patent 10,870,632 is more restrictive than 8,895,078. The supercritical extraction claims are removed entirely and the subcritical extraction pressure range was changed from 100 - 350

[bbuddwisserr104]