Post by
TeamEddie on Sep 09, 2022 2:50pm
For clarity I say we do better as a company
the reason I think going to production is better is when the extremes work in our favour the share price will run - most likely over $7
A buyout would be closer to $5
ATLAS puts up on $100m to develop a mine and easily gets all the money back
a company buys at say $500m +$100m to develop a different scenario for them
Comment by
MoneyK on Sep 09, 2022 3:05pm
Climate change will affect ocean levels. NL might even no longer exist and all the salt might dissolve. Bitcoins could be a safer bet for sure. Seriously... $500M? Once this ramps-up to 6M+ tons per year, it would most likely generate $200M+ of profit per year.... worth a lot more than $500M... IMO. MoneyK
Comment by
TeamEddie on Sep 09, 2022 3:12pm
A risk assessment will consider climate change and if you do not think that it you are not thinking clear they will not value it at more than 10 years impossible to take on that much risk
Comment by
Zephyr on Sep 09, 2022 3:13pm
Lol...I guess it's time I learn to swim :)
Comment by
MoneyK on Sep 09, 2022 4:58pm
Crunchy, $500M profit per year is pushing it... whats your calculation? MoneyK
Comment by
MoneyK on Sep 09, 2022 6:42pm
Thats not profit Crunchy. You need at minimum to remove ongoing capex and sustaining, interest, taxes, royalties, etc., which maybe will shrink that $500M by 40%? Taxes only are like 35%? Math is math, but EBITDA is not profit. IMO. MoneyK
Comment by
Crunchy2chew on Sep 10, 2022 4:59am
Liked2think. My god i basically agree with the last post you made. Perhaps there is hope. Oh well this site has generally gone to shat. I am leaving. See you on the otherside of the buyouts.
Comment by
silentrunning on Sep 10, 2022 3:00pm
Crunchy......its gotta be exhausting dualing with an MPD. Obviously in their manic phase or theyre out of meds.