Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF

TSXV:SFF - Post Discussion

Seafield Resources Ltd > Similar Trends
View:
Post by SupplyChainGuru on Jan 25, 2012 7:03pm

Similar Trends

is anybody familiar with other companies (doesnt have to be in the same region), that had similar findings to that of SFF?

I've seend some posters in the past who were able to calculate (to some proximity) the sp based on those drill results and comparing them to historical figures to those of other drillers.

 

any expert evaluators out there?

Comment by Buddy_Fox on Jan 25, 2012 11:05pm
Pick your valuation for $/oz of gold in ground then multiply it by the gold in ground pretty simple, from there you give bonuses or penalties for things like location, type of potential mine, the infrastructure trifecta (water, road and power) Compare it to neighbours valuations, BAT hasn't even put out a solid NI 43101 and its trading at a 3.4x mcap of SFF. On simalar grades, just a lot more ...more