Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sigma Lithium Corp V.SGML

Alternate Symbol(s):  SGML

Sigma Lithium Corporation is a Canada-based global lithium producer dedicated to powering electric vehicle batteries with carbon neutral, socially and environmentally sustainable chemical-grade lithium concentrate. The Company's operations are vertically integrated. It operates at the forefront in the EV battery materials supply chain at its Grota do Cirilo Operation in Brazil. The Company... see more

TSXV:SGML - Post Discussion

View:
Post by retiredcf on Mar 27, 2024 10:12am

BMO

Needless to say, we are miles away from his or the consensus target. GLTA

BMO Nesbitt Burns analyst Joel Jackson warns Sigma Lithium Corp.’s (SGML-QSGML-X) fourth-quarter update on Monday is likely to be “noisy.”

“Q4 won’t be pretty because of industry-wide multi-month delays in finalizing spodumene price realizations including one Q3 SGML shipment’s provisional price trued up in Q4 - we now model Q4E EBITDA of negative $37-million,” he said.

“First, we assume Q4 spodumene shipments (64kt) are priced US$1k/t (end-of-quarter pricing). Second, we assume the second Q3 shipment (22kt) was also repriced at US$1k/t (vs. Q3 ASP US$2.5k/t) resulting in a $45-million negative retroactive hit in Q4. Third, we assume US$553/t fob port cash costs, slightly better than US$577/t in Q3 (while October was indicated US$485/t, November costs were higher with magnetic separation added). Fourth, we assume G&A stayed high at $15-million.”

Also modifying his expansion schedule for the Vancouver-based company, Mr. Jackson lowered his target for Sigma Lithium’s Nasdaq-listed shares to US$30 from US$38, reiterating an “outperform” recommendation. The average is $47.74 (Canadian).

“Despite continued noise around Sigma, we still see upside as SGML (with sizable Brazilian spodumene assets) continues to re-rate to lithium feedstock producer, and ramps production over subsequent years,” he said. “While an imminent takeout now seems unlikely, there is ample upside if SGML delivers on targets.”

Be the first to comment on this post