Sokoman Minerals Corp V.SIC

Scorecard

[AuAgLi8]

-SIC $ 60 million.
-NFG $ 922 million.
-MOZ $ 541 million.
-LAB $ 65 million..
- NFG had more decent assays today , SIC update soon .
-SIC is on a deep seated suture . The hope is there is a really rich feeder still intact.
-SIC is Undervalued .

- Draw Your Own conclusions.

[AlwaysLong683]

AuAg, NFG's 63.7 over 8.45m assay result reported today yields 538 m*g/t Au. While not nearly as impressive as some of NFG's best holes...... 261.3 over 7.2m = 1,881 m*g/t Au 92.9 over 19.0m = 1,765 m*g/t Au      24.0 over 46.0m = 1,104 m*g/t Au      106.5 over 9.15m = 974 m*g/t Au        22.3 over 41.35m = 922 m*g/t Au    it

[Ethanator]

I agree. Today's results were ho hum only compared to last weeks results. They are still very good. 

[BlueChipper2020]

SIC has drilled a lot more than 6 holes?? Further, there are several historic holes going back to early 2000's. SIC market cap is about 1/15th of NFG so no need to compare the two. You can buy NFG and you will be paying 15 times more for it. The below are two high grades which you do not seem to account for. The first is published by the Company on almost all drill PRs yielding gxm of 633.42

[AlwaysLong683]

Blue I am only talking about holes where they hit grades/lengths good enough to report. I only went back as far as November 2020 plus what I thought was their first hole of significance (44.96 over 11.9m). I stand corrected if you are aware of more cores of significance that SIC has drilled - thanks for the input. Re. relative value of NFG vs. SIC: I have previously outlined the reasons why I

[AlwaysLong683]

Just did another search for NFG royalties, and they are indeed slated to pay them: "All projects carry low royalties below 2.1% with most properties carrying 0 - 1.0%" SIC's Moosehead project:    2% NSR Royalty.