Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sokoman Minerals Corp V.SIC

Alternate Symbol(s):  SICNF

Sokoman Minerals Corp. is a discovery-oriented company with projects in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Its projects include Moosehead Gold, Fleur de Lys, Grey River Gold, Kepenkeck Gold, Killick Lithium, Crippleback Lake Gold, Startrek and Iron Horse. Moosehead Gold property includes 98 claims totaling 2,450 hectares adjacent to the Trans-Canada Highway in central Newfoundland. Fleur de Lys... see more

TSXV:SIC - Post Discussion

Sokoman Minerals Corp > Comparative
View:
Post by geezer21 on Nov 12, 2021 7:32pm

Comparative

Both Newfound Gold and Sokoman Minerals have been finding high grade gold at shallow depth in Newfoundland.  For comparison are the drill intercepts from Newfound Gold and Sokoman Minerals.  Which is which is not identified just to illustrate that both companies are  equally delineating significant gold deposits. Labrador on the same trend as Newfound Gold has been showing significant drill results also.



A     B  
Interval* (m) g/t   Interval* (m) g/t
19 92.9   2.3 79.23
7.9 24.1   24.9 33.56
18.9 31.2   11.8 6.61
18.4 15.8   9.05 70.29
41.4 22.3   44.96 11.9
6.9 44.5   4.2 8.95
4.1 40.1   4.6 47.2
16.9 25   8.1 68.25
6.1 10.3   3.5 12.39
13.1 45.3   3.05 16.54
2.4 29.3   6.7 3.25
10.3 25   5.1 15.51
5.8 19.8   4.1 1.52
7.3 19.3   42 64
10.4 22.5   1.5 6.18
15.9 31.4   11.6 21.07
18.2 10   3 1.82
13.8 28.4   5 26.87
3.3 20.6   3 1.61
2 17.1   20.95 5.15
2.9 13.7   1.8 11.85
2.1 136.7   5.4 2.76
14.1 31.5   10.4 3.09
5.6 13.7   3.6 10.4
32.3 6.2   4 24.92
4.7 131.1   22.1 1.65
17.7 124.4   3.5 11.95
4.1 45.6   9.5 5.7
7.9 22.7   5.2 16.85
39.1 25.8   1.6 30.97
2.3 41.6   4.1 21.6
3 49.4   7.2 22.35
4.7 27.8   6.4 17.34
3.9 24.5   3 7.85
6.5 37.1   9.8 6.65
8.5 17.9   4.6 1.21
3.5 19.3   1.55 5.23
11.4 29.1   4.6 1.21
2 41.8   1.55 5.23
13.7 61.8   4.95 27.7
7 15.6   1 54.63
9.2 106.5   4.8 17.56
7.2 261.3   9.2 6.7
2.5 16.9   2.35 20.39
8.4 63.7   5.1 7.64
25.6 146.2   2.35 20.39
8.1 21.4   5.1 7.64
12.9 14.9   4.25 2.58
      2.28 13.67
      2.4 0.75
      5.2 7.68
      3.7 9.1
      0.8 41.01
      6 6.47
      2.2 4.35
      3.6 21.86
      2.55 22.45
      1.7 2.73
      3.1 8.6
      1.1 4.72
      1.2 2.94
      2 1.82
      18.9 13.09
      1.4 60.94
      2.65 1.85
      0.5 22.72
      0.45 278
      17.11 11.05
      2.65 1.85
      0.5 22.72
      0.45 278
      17.11 11.05
      1.53 170.31
      16.84 14.07
Comment by likeike on Nov 12, 2021 8:00pm
So again you stoop to confuse. Which is company A and which is company B or are we to make assumptions that they are not the same. IKE
Comment by BlueChipper2020 on Nov 13, 2021 12:11am
Geezer,  I recognize the drill results. Column A is NFG and Column B is SIC. I am an early investor in SIC going back to 2018 and have had a sizeable position and built a good position in NFG the past several months. So I am not biased in saying that SIC does not have the monster hits that NFG has had. NFG has had several very wide intersections and grades per tonne at crazy levels. They ...more  
Comment by likeike on Nov 13, 2021 9:53am
Blue Chipper my old friend it took 6 weeks to get the results back on a expediated basis from the lab.on barge results. With NFG  fully adopting Chrysos technology and putting a machine  eventually in Gander if nothing elses it will speed up the labs as I am sure they get  more core form NFG but how fast do you see SIC using photometric assay and how soon will it be readily ...more  
Comment by guy491 on Nov 13, 2021 10:48am
Likeike the first results on barge take 6 weeks but now it will take 2-3 weeks because they sent samples every 2 weeks...and the 6 weeks of waiting is over.
Comment by geezer21 on Nov 13, 2021 4:27pm
"...do you really believe the market is that dumb at this point with NFG valuation at about $1.3Billion and SIC at $70M? Markets are imperfect but lets not be realistic. Again, I love both companies." Good question. As of Jun 21 financial report SIC was trading at 4.375 of book and NFG was trading at 14.672 of book. However, their gold deposit assets are not booked yet and will not be ...more  
Comment by BlueChipper2020 on Nov 13, 2021 4:57pm
Geezer You are basically trying to make the case SIC should be valued at the level NFG is because the markets do not have your wisdom. It is one thing to argue that NFG valuation is high and many can say Tesla is far to high. So what. You are doing price to book valuations on junior miners? NFG valuation is what the market says not me and not you. You really believe your posting on this board to ...more  
Comment by geezer21 on Nov 13, 2021 9:59pm
"You are basically trying to make the case SIC should be valued at the level NFG" No.  You need to be more decerning in your reading.
Comment by geezer21 on Nov 13, 2021 10:23pm
'You are basically trying to make the case SIC should be valued at the level NFG' The value of SIC, NFG, LAB, and any other mining company is determined not by you, me, or any shareholder but by the value of the gold in the ground, the cost to get it out, the market price of gold, the jurisidction of operations, managment skill, weather, terrain, location, infrastructure, labour ...more  
Comment by BlueChipper2020 on Nov 14, 2021 4:44am
Wrong. The value is ultimately determined by the market price which is the best indicator of fair value as per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 9 level 1 fair value of publicly traded companies.). One price is 8.51 for the 1.3B company and the other $.35 for the 70M company. FYI even 43-101 valuations do not supercede the fair value of a trading price. Your posts are now a waste ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities