Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sonoro Energy Ltd. V.SNV

Alternate Symbol(s):  SNVFF

Sonoro Energy Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas company. The Company is focused on oil and gas exploration and production in Canada and abroad, including the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region. The Company has drilled two wells in Saskatchewan. The Well 11-30-32-23 W3 was a vertical well and the Well 14-29-32-23 W3 was a Waseca formation multi-lateral horizontal well with four horizontal... see more

TSXV:SNV - Post Discussion

View:
Post by Hcgfllkp on Sep 29, 2022 4:54pm

SGE

Per last PR, SGE is now the operator of the PSC and has 75% ownership. The MOU requires SNV to produce a detailed reserves report. Being that SNV is broke and under a mountain of debt, how difficult would it be for SGE to simply let SNV go insolvent, fail to produce the report, and claim 100% PSC ownership? My guess - not too difficult.  
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 5:00pm
But the fact is what you describe has been the situation for over 3 years. So why would SGE suddenly call SNV and sign a MOU in June of this year after 2 years of intransigence? Please why if what you say is plausible?
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 5:04pm
ONLY cause Migas told SGE to respect the PSC contract and quit bargaining in bad faith not too mention start producing or lose PSC as well. Contrary to many here don't realize that SNV knowledge and expertise is required for SGE to be successful
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 5:12pm
People do not appreciate the expertise required for oil and gas industry and how uncommon it is. Remember Bankers? It was sold to a Chinese firm and many believe the Chinese bought Bankers to learn about deep extraction. Also, many are writing off the entire Siberian oil fields with the departure of Western companies because the Russians do not possess the expertise.
Comment by Hcgfllkp on Sep 29, 2022 5:12pm
2 years ago, SNV was designated operator of the project. Now SGE is the operator. It would seem whatever value SNV brought to the project has been diminshed.
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 5:14pm
Yes that's a riddle. Perhaps you can spend some time on it and share your insights.
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 5:17pm
Ark... Are you implying a complete buy out similar to Bankers petroleum maybe happening by SGE?
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 5:26pm
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/bankers-petroleum-ltd-enters-into-definitive-agreement-to-be-acquired-by-an-affiliate-of-geo-jade-petroleum-corporation-572824811.html
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 5:29pm
Sorry link didn't work..... Canadas Bankers Petroleum Ltd (BNK.TO), one of Albanias largest foreign investors, said on Sunday it has agreed to be acquired by affiliates of Chinas Geo-Jade Petroleum Corp for $575 million (Canadian). Bankers Petroleum said it will be bought by firms owned by the Chinese oil and gas exploration and production company for $2.20 per share.
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 5:30pm
The only missing link here is that we've not been in operation, unlike Bankers before they were taken out. One has to presume that the value we bring to this venture has yet to materialize, or at least part of it
Comment by SlyFox1 on Sep 29, 2022 7:58pm
guess question is how quickly could SNV help get Selat to production. If rigs and equipment are on site, do you think we could see a bankers style buyout by Christmas 
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 8:19pm
Sly... My take after seeing Jimmy try to hijack our PSC share makes it apparent he wants it ALL and not have any constraints of a partnership. My belief is reserve is being used part of negotiations to prove our SP valuation. I'll take 2.67 / SH.... ;))
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 8:36pm
No. If I'm not mistaken, Bankers were 2 years into production when the offer was received. I think they shop it around. They brought concrete value add to the resource. I would think you have to have shown production growth profile before attracting big money, which I think would mean not just reactivation of existing wells but also discovery of new areas to increase the resource. Again value ...more  
Comment by SlyFox1 on Sep 29, 2022 9:01pm
Make sense, in Kirk we trust. Just wonder if in the current dynamic O&G market if instead of years of production growth, we could get away with a few quarters of production growth, and reserves showIng higher 2P in the previously untapped portions of Selat 
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 9:09pm
you're sure in a hurry. Are you planning to leave us mortals soon? I don't think so IMO. Remember the $74 mil USD expenditure over 5 years? If we're looking for a straight buyout soon then I'll stick with my $25 mil. go away fee. Otherwise, if we get a real project underway, with JOA, Work Program, SGE ownership in SNV and increased PSC ownership for SNV, then we will be much ...more  
Comment by SlyFox1 on Sep 29, 2022 9:25pm
Cheers Ark. I'll be here for a long time, and in no rush at all. Personally wouldn't mind seeing Kirk turn SNV to a real oil company with multiple blocks under ownership once Selat gets going. Pretty sure West Kampar is still out there for tender and Budong still hasn't been picked up by anyone from what I can tell.   
Comment by martindale on Sep 29, 2022 11:25pm
Personally not against what you are suggesting Ark but I believe your a little low.. the known reserve that Sonoro has 25% of is $1.5 B CDN, even 5% of that is $75 Mil, your suggesting they want to sell for 1.75% ish, of the value in their share of the project? Not without a royalty guaranteed would $25 mill be near enough, Migas didn’t and isn’t letting SGE pull a fast one that’s why we got the ...more  
Comment by StratCap on Sep 30, 2022 12:51am
  Solid reasoning there.  I'd be happy with $75 million on a buyout plus Migas awards SNV with a new PSC on a new block with majority ownership. One can dream.  Whats the chance of this happening NEXT WEEK? Good luck all.
Comment by ark88 on Sep 30, 2022 7:19am
It's the nature of the stock market I guess. Many are consumed with upside potential only. I try not to worry about the huge potential here, because I already did when I chose to buy shares. Now, I'm more concerned with downside risk and knowing that i can still make a decent return for chump change buyout allows me some degree of comfort while we wait through this dark period. GLTA!
Comment by Tree2tree on Sep 29, 2022 9:05pm
Ark, that is a lot of posts in one day all designed to make excuses for management.
Comment by ark88 on Sep 29, 2022 5:27pm
Go back a year or two ago when SGE served notice, I believe, I posted a comment about the importance of knowing what SGE has been doing since the PSC award in 2019 without informing SNV. Well, it turns out they have been doing something operationally and after 2 years they suddenly call SNV then proceed to sign a MOU. Draw your own conclusions.
Comment by MJB4231 on Sep 29, 2022 5:42pm
Crazy curious of your hypothesis as to your opinion as to why they did? If u don't want to post PM it
Comment by copperplay on Sep 29, 2022 5:51pm
  Ark what about rigs set up on the site and recent visits?  Can you confirm any of this ?   current stock price is for Jimmy watch and see 
Comment by martindale on Sep 30, 2022 11:29am
i believe after looking at the release the way it is worded has confused a few people, JMO but, my take is that Sonoro is the operator on the selat field or what ever was designated in the original deal but the Baku field wasn’t part of the deal so SGE is the operator of that field, and likely getting advice from SNV, again just my take on it... In addition, SGE, as project operator, have advised ...more  
Comment by Tree2tree on Sep 29, 2022 8:55pm
Hcg, I believe you are on the right track.  But many on this board are still not willing to imagine anything but an optimistic scenario.  As if indebted, penny stock companies with failed projects never go bankrupt. My own 'feeling' is that the partner/opponent wants SNV out of the way, and they are in a very strong position to get what they want.  The scanty information ...more  
Comment by Hcgfllkp on Sep 30, 2022 2:18pm
Good points Tree & Subin. If Menara / Sumatra are the big deep pocket institutions they've been made out to be it would be easy for them to bring in hired guns. If SNV can't produce a reserves report they're going to be in a very weak position and (low-ball?) buy-out may be in the cards...  Interesting story regardless.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities