Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Soho Resources Corp V.SOH

TSXV:SOH - Post Discussion

Soho Resources Corp > after 30 yrs
View:
Post by maclellan3 on Dec 07, 2012 8:44pm

after 30 yrs

If name changed would be third time since I first  bought in to this failed company

first split 1 for 5...now looking at 1 for 8  or 1 for 13 since I bought in.

The first Mexican property awarded to SOH through the courts

The present silver property delayed account residents unhappy ..with what

This stoch almost 30 yrs ago climber to $1.24 and quickly dropped to

around where it is today after an insider sold out'

With little or no  input   from regulators...the best option fill out your

proxy and dump the whole gang. What is there to lose at ,01 cent garbage

Comment by SilverBells on Dec 08, 2012 11:45pm
After my last posting, sure enough the voting form came out. 8 to 1 is in the cards. With the 40 odd million shares current management owns (and more coming with sweetheart deals) I would think us lowly share holders on this board will have little effect on the outcome. But it's easy to vote, I'll do my part and say,"NO to all." Would love to see this company taken out but that ...more