How could i misinterpret Farq drill placements ?
Very easy.
Conductivity map does not match... Mag survey map. Conductivity map appears
as if they took part of venning mtn and made it apart of
the 2nd grange ridgeline. That's what threw me off - making me think they were drilling
lower elevation of venning entering basin, shoulder side. Mag survey map matches geophysics of... satellite maps. Mag survey is best representstion of land layout. Mag survey identifies the mag anomalies.
While
conductivity didn't even pick up on grange historicals where slam drilled
first two holes which intercepted the minerals.
I'm a huge fan of conductivity surveys.
But in this case... seeing is believing -
conductivity missed lots. Hence mag survey is best for reading the targets in this Brunswick geology.
Surficial sediments and clays are nortorious for throwing off conductivity readings. Here have a look
mag is completely diff than conductivity.
Very odd... Lower Venning mtn appears merged with grange ridgeline 2.
Hence why i thought Farq was more N/E tapping lower venning ranges.
At the end of the day,
i'm very happy farq is --------> grange # 2 ridgeline.
Simply line up second ridgeline to Malissen = aligns perfectly.
open in new window
Cheers....