Therma Bright Inc V.THRM

Camel toe moe and Sona bag holders

[Kaiser]

You clowns can now eat a bag of sh!t your bags at Sona just got so heavy it's game over.

Months of your bs trolling and lies all while pumping Sona here.  Your supposedly better covid play just quit their test! Ouch

What about abcd bragging how he bought Sona at $1.03 because it was such a better play.  
No knowledge kids.

[Chrisvaughan]

Wouldn't be so quick, this coukd be and a good chsnce to be thrms fate. Tread carefully

[Chrisvaughan]

These saliva tests i would think are all based on the same science I would think, I have shsres here but sonas news has me rethinking

[TheeRook]

 Read about the difficulties of Saliva testing. Then read how the companies / groups that test Saliva overcame the problems of testing Saliva. THRM does not give much into how they are doing it. BUt all these companies indicate U can not test saliva directly with any consistency which SONA found out. BC Health  Swish and Gargle Saliva test gives some good color on it. CODX -   

[Smokey1958]

The problem is not with saliva as a sample but in the tests themselves. With all the news out by THRM ...they have met the challenge!!! The following is from a Canadian study done at McGill University and published in January. “Nasopharyngeal swabs are very sensitive, but they are time-consuming and require a trained health professional to administer. Saliva-based samples are as sensitive

[TheeRook]

  This is just stating the obvious, Saliva sampling is easier than NP sampling.   This does not cover the actual testing of the Saliva sample.  Which SONA found out is not so easy and why the first test were NP tests , then shallow nasal sampling.  

[Boudi1959]

Saliva-based testing has shown accuracy in detecting positive coronavirus infection 83 percent of the time, while nose-throat swab tests have shown 85 percent accuracy, according to a review of dataTrusted Source from 16 studies including 5,900 participants published in JAMA Internal Medicine.  The study authors also report that saliva-based testing has shown 99 percent accuracy

[Boudi1959]

Results: Overall, 37 studies were included, comprising 7,169 participants with 7,332 paired saliva samples and nasopharyngeal swabs. A total of 2,327 (32%) were positive on either nasopharyngeal swab or saliva. The sensitivity for salivary testing was overall 3.4% lower (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.9% to +3.1%) compared to the nasopharyngeal swab. The pooled sensitivity for saliva testing

[TheeRook]

No Doubt. Codx skewed the results to the upside. Co-Diagnostics, Inc. Releases COVID-19 Test Performance Data: Consistently Demonstrates 100% Sensitivity and 100% Specificity Across Independent Evaluations by Co-Diagnostics | May 1, 2020 | News Release Salt Lake City, Utah – May 1, 2020 – Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (Nasdaq:CODX) (the Company), a

[Smokey1958]

If you actually read the original paper you will see that the viral sample in saliva is as good as or better than a nasopharyngeal sample. Of course, because you still haven't yet revealed your intent on this board you haven't bothered to do that because it might expose that. Cheers!!!  

[TheeRook]

 I am here like many others promoting better companies. C0-Diagnostics  (CODX)  had the best Saliva Test around.   100% 100%  Independant ly verified. Its a saliva test. that tests saliva samples that has Viruses.  Better than the NP swabs. Not like the WHO who finally admit  Coronavirus Is Airborne. It’s Too Late or  the people who do not wear

[Smokey1958]

So, you don't own shares in THRM but you're extraordinarily altruistic and post here to save us all from this mistake. Since you've been posting (there have not been "many others") the only company that has shown any promise and even it is now meeting challenges with sales of its rapid test, is Abbott Labs. As for CO-Diagnostics you forgot to mention that it'

[TheeRook]

  Anyways I was not reply to U but u had to stick your nose in here and twist things around.  And I am not trying to save anyone. Everyone makes their own decisions, I do not give recommendations. I was replying to  Chrisvaughan who had concerns Saliva Tests do not work from the SONA Results.  So I told homw to look into some Successful Saliva Tests to see how they did

[Boudi1959]

You posted here every company on earth and now codx on this board, what is your motive if you sold ( as you claimed ) at the highest price and you made money? Why are you pissed? You don't even know what will be our final test and how much emprovement THRM made lately? We all know, that out price per kit will make it hard for competitors to compete. It will be be the best and the cheapest

[TheeRook]

abcd2020 (194) User Actions   June 11, 2021 - 01:15 PM 41 Reads Post# 33372995 RE:Don’t feed the trolls see guy exactly, these pumpers r so emotional, this is a high risk stock could be of same SONA fate. LOOK i m bashing SONA AT SAME TIME. and they think i will hold trash stocks for long term.

[Skipabeat22]

Everyone who is invested here knows the risks but remember this, just because another companys test failed it dosen't mean Therma's will.  Rob sent out an email not long ago where he said that it was time to sell the test, which I take as we have a working product.  If you have your doubts sell if your here to bash, your days are numbered as news is expected soon.

[stockmonster6]

Brazil is not their first live sample study.  They did one before which proved their results.  Now they needed to do the mandated study. I am very confident that THRM's technology is solid.  Unlike SONA, who did nothing to set up the market for their test, THRM has done so.  Obviously, they either know or have great belief that it will be good. SONA had it all backwards

[Kaiser]

100% different scenarios.  Therma took its time and tweaked their test.  No bs here.     

[Chrisvaughan]

Why wouldn't sona just tweek theirs

[hk1966]

Yes great point and take some money off the table just in case THRM experiences the same fate as SONA eventually 

[Kaiser]

Oh boy... you better get out.  Lol  

[Chrisvaughan]

Look at the reasons why sona failed, how does accuvid not suffer same fate

[BlackMazz]

The tech at sona was not that good from the beginning, and I think it is more difficut for them to "tweak" it, than thrm tech based on polypeptides and working with reputable partners. I don't remember the exact numbers, but acuvid seemed already better than the conventional, nasal test from sona. They worked with their partners for a relatively long time now, and the preliminary