Therma Bright Inc V.THRM

.

[nrv090909]

https://pennystocks.news/therma-bright-thrm-tsx-saliva-covid-test-may-drive-these-shares-higher-on-fda-approval-should-you-buy-now/

[Boudi1959]

Many of these dogs barking and bashing now will be history. FDA approval is guaranteed, once they agree on how to divide the wealth between the big guys in the US.  Have you guys watched Dr.Oz yesterday? His show was about the rapid antigen home kit. Watch it and see how better off they will be by using AcuVid. We have much better product by far. As we all know US always wants to keep the

[Commoncents]

I'm not bashing, I'm hopping for FDA approval and soon but there are no guarantees in life other than death and taxes. Some positive news heading into the wwekf would be amazing. The busy USA thanksgiving holiday is coming up in the latter part of November and having AcuVid available before that would be fantastic. 

[Dude51]

One more note all tests on Dr Oz were done buy swab up the nose and none were done in 15 minutes. 

[TheeRook]

 The reason for the nasal swab is the virus will be detected earlier in the nasal cavity than the saliva resulting in earlier detection. A saliva test that is negative does not mean your negative or for many of the rapid tests as noted on their FDA sheets.. In a scientific article published in the journal Cell, scientists at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health and the

[Smokey1958]

The study (June 2020) you quote was concerning the value of the use of masks ....and had nothing to do with covid tests. Once again you're throwing out "expert" information and then putting your own contrived conclusion. The following studies ALL demonstrate the equality of a saliva sample compared to a nasal sample. From January of this year ...our own Canadian study

[TheeRook]

 This study is using some of the best RT-PCR test equipment.  Acuvid is not at this level. Laboratory testing RT-PCR at SGH was performed using the automated cobas 6800 system (Roche, Branchburg, NJ, USA) on an automated cobas 6800 system, with results inferred according to the manufacturer’s specifications. NP and saliva samples sent to Lucence Laboratory underwent RNA extraction

[moonball32]

So are you saying this is a scam company ?

[Dude51]

I just read the study title and the date. I don't bash company's that I am trying to make money on. Not a shorter, just and investor who read a head line of an article and brought it to this boards attention. I am holding for $20.00 a share not 20 bucks for my whole investment. This is the title that caught my attention: "Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs

[Dude51]

Here's another study, thanks Ambedkar on CEO.CA for finding this: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82787-z

[Boudi1959]

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82787-z https://muhc.ca/news-and-patient-stories/releases/saliva-samples-covid-19-testing-good-nasopharyngeal-swabs-cheaper

[Kaiser]

I won't even read your entire no knowledge pump post.  Nothing in life is guaranteed you dumb fuk! Especially when it comes to the market.  The simple fact someone would even suggest something like this is guaranteed shows how dumb they are. I still own shares but have set a mental stop limit where I'm taking profit and moving on.  Rob said sit back and watch the "

[Boudi1959]

stop barking and keep sucking