Theralase Technologies Inc. V.TLT

Softening up for a stink bid?

[fredgoodwinson]

The upshot of the ‘mistake’ at the start of Phase II is that Lumeda and others look set to establish the commercial potential of TLD-1433 in the biggest cancer killer of all before Theralase shareholders have even got to know whether it might or might not be a competitor in non muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

 

Add that to a sustained campaign to suppress the share price and we`re already seeing capitulation apathy from punch-drunk retail shareholders selling at 13 cents when their intuition tells them that it should be 13 dollars and talk from people who have been here for years of grateful acceptance of an offer of $2-$3 per share - valuing what may soon be shown to be the non-invasive destruction of deep cancers at less than a billion dollars.

 

 

 

[Johnandrose22]

Thank you for your typically candid and insightful post, especially your not so subtle inference regarding the “mistake” made in Phase 2 dosimetry. I continue to find it difficult to believe it was a mistake. OK...I said it...again. John

[floatinketucky]

Seems to me the same template for Phase 1 would have been used with simple write in for the allowance of the 2nd treatment.  It's really a slap in the face for the company and shareholders.  What if Covid had not caused the delay??  Jeez....    The company has accepted the blame and given the hospitial immunity from neglagance. And really the company had no choice

[Hankerchief]

Theralase is possibly bordering on a highly effective therapeutic option for cancer/infection that could benefit millions of people and it's like they are running in mud IMO.  WTH?  Get your act together and get on with it FFS.....IMO and again IMO as RR would say.

[CAinPlap]

Hachet or Hachey job? ;) To be fair, doubt trial "misstake" was her fault. It is Dr. K's loyalty we need to question given his involvement with much larger, deeper pocketed companies.

[Eoganacht]

It is not a question of loyalty. It's a question of integrity. I believe Dr. Kulkarni will go with the solution which is most beneficial for cancer patients. If he put patient's lives at risk to make a few extra dollars he would not be a doctor. Just another dirty moneygrubber.

[enriquesuave]

I totally agree there Eoganacht.  We don't know how or why this bladder volume error occurred, but it definitely set the protocol straight once and for all.  It will ensure that no Urologist ever makes that mistake again as we now know one cannot compromise on bladder volume regardless of green light  intensity.IMO

[Longholder99]

Agree with Eoganacht.....Dr K and the rest at UHN are not concerned with the comings and goings at TLT or the ramblings of rank and file bashers on some bullboard they probably havent heard of nor care to. Their reputations as researchers and physicians im guessing means more to them than interim results on just one of the projects they are involved in. The slip up was likely just that and was

[Researchbased]

Another amateure comment from a representative of the armchair quarterbacks club! ... lolll  Another one into plot theories, another one "that knows how it works"! ... ;-) CainPlap thinks that Dr. Kulkarni should have devoted all its time to only one clinical trial!  Wow! Should Dr. Jewett also have done the same? And all these other MDs in all their different practices over

[enriquesuave]

Yes it's hard to believe it was a mistake given the optimisation changes made in PH1 on patients 5 & 6 which led to the early completion of that trial with perfect results.  They had further optimized the hardware following that success and I believe had doubled the light intensity of the fibre optic device.  Maybe that led them to estimate that perhaps they could use average

[fredgoodwinson]

Much appreciated John. Finding it difficult to move on from that ‘mIstake’ myself. Not sure whether it’s that each member of our learned MSAB individually failed to notice that they’d neglected to specify the manner of dosing or that the Chief Clinical Investigator - lacking any such guidance - then failed to refer back to them to specifically obtain it or whether it’s that for the incorrect

[fredgoodwinson]

Seems that you may have an agenda here too Tom - or is just (yuk) 'Gadgie'? 

[fredgoodwinson]

Tom I may have nmisinterpreted your post (it`s not difficult!) - if you weren`t personally insulting me please accept apologies for the response.

[menoalittle]

>> I continue to find it difficult to believe it was a mistake. moi aussi