Post by
jicoop on Jun 30, 2021 5:59pm
did not like
Did not like the 47.8% no response number, very high. :(
Comment by
bartlman on Jun 30, 2021 6:03pm
Yep. Would've been nice to have some questions asked about it. Is this the same group where bladder measurements were too small and these guys did not get the optimal treatment?
Comment by
enriquesuave on Jun 30, 2021 6:04pm
That was the 8 from the initial 12 undertreated patients and probably patient number 4 from PH1 who also didn't receive an Optimized treatment. We will need to see the data on optimized treated patients once available. Another 3 at next Quarterly report imo
Comment by
enriquesuave on Jun 30, 2021 6:09pm
We already knew about those 9 patients. I believe only 2 or 3 patients from the first set of 12 PH2 patients got a 2nd treatment which was optimized, plus now patients 13 and on got 1st optimized treatment. Will they post a replay of AGM I came in a bit late.
Comment by
StevenBirch on Jun 30, 2021 6:12pm
Only 12.5% no response for those who received the optimized treatment though. I would say let's wait for the quarterly update and any new data that we get. Pretty bland presentation actually.
Comment by
enriquesuave on Jun 30, 2021 6:22pm
That 12.5 no response in the optimized group was patient who suffered both the grade 3 and 5 SAE and died IMHO. This patient had a negative or no cancer at 30 day cytology analysis, but sadly died of heart failure before 3 months Cystoscope exam.
Comment by
VentureGuy24 on Jun 30, 2021 6:28pm
Anyone notice......no doctors this year! Why no Jewett? Why no Lilge? ETC
Comment by
enriquesuave on Jun 30, 2021 6:33pm
I guess there wasn't enough data to get the Drs to speak. Next quarterly in a month should be more informative IMO. Just hope data of optimized patients continues to be good.
Comment by
DJDawg on Jun 30, 2021 6:49pm
So if I'm hearing everyone correctly no new patient data? No new info that would alter this thread's previous discussion about the existing patients? I can live with that (till next newsletter) but wanted to be sure. Any comment on that one patient who passed away? Were they removed from data altogether or are they that non-responder from the most recent newsletter?