Post by
99942Apophis on Jun 10, 2022 11:10am
Patients 20 & 21
Patient 20 announced June 11/2021 just hit 360 days and although patients 21 to 24 were announced August 30/2021 my guesstimate is patient 21 will hit 360 days very close to the AGM.
By years end (2022) we should see 24 patients hitting 450 days with a strong possibility of patient 25 getting in too.
Comment by
langosta on Jun 10, 2022 2:28pm
Never thought of it like that. Surely if treatments are administered correctly there can only be Complete Response or Partial Response. Would there be a cut off % for Partial Response where anything below cut off would be considered as No Response.
Comment by
99942Apophis on Jun 10, 2022 2:57pm
Eoganacht my answer will either make you laugh or cry, I use my math only to calculate time frames which are on a hand crafted chart I keep on my coffee table. I have given up on their information as it always leaves me uncertain and if read in the morning I end up drinking way too much coffee, if read in the afternoon then I drink way too much beer with a vodka chaser!
Comment by
Eoganacht on Jun 10, 2022 3:13pm
Hi 99942Apophis - I think I'm going to follow your example. The more I try to understand the more confused I get. As of now I don't understand what that 20 patient table in the MD&A is all about. I'm just going to wait until they tell us more.
Comment by
Rumpl3StiltSkin on Jun 10, 2022 3:58pm
Ha Ha, I applaud you gents keep trying to crunch these numbers. For me is TLT's solution potentially still better than Keytruda? Yes. I think that the final figures will be way better than Keytruda. Which is valued in the $Billions.
Comment by
Eoganacht on Jun 10, 2022 5:38pm
Thanks DJDawg. That's very helpful.
Comment by
Eoganacht on Jun 10, 2022 5:45pm
Maybe they also excluded patient 4 from the phase 1b who had metastatic cancer and would not have been evaluated after 138 days. That would make 20.
Comment by
DJDawg on Jun 10, 2022 5:49pm
Yes! That makes sense as it fits the wording for that particular table.
Comment by
Eoganacht on Jun 10, 2022 6:12pm
On the other hand, 5 of the first 12 phase 2 patients were also removed from the study so who really knows what's going on.
Comment by
StevenBirch on Jun 10, 2022 7:30pm
Maybe the first question at the AGM should be "why are the numbers presented in such a confusing fashion?"
Comment by
Oilminerdeluxe on Jun 11, 2022 5:19am
Anyone going to the AGM who likes to ask questions, feel free to ask if they can present their data so even regular folks can understand it. We should not have to guess what they mean. It is outright insulting to shareholders. Hopefully, they will make a good day out of the AGM
Comment by
Gooseybear on Jun 11, 2022 6:56am
Perhaps the regulators are also having a hard time understanding the numbers, and from having worked with regulators for many years, if it's not documented well, it doesn't exist. TLTF track record not so great so they need to be extremely clear and concise.
Comment by
Infinity on Jun 11, 2022 9:57am
Goisey, Your observations on clarity is spot on!!!
Comment by
langosta on Jun 11, 2022 7:11am
It's called 'deliberate obfuscation'.