Theralase Technologies Inc. V.TLT

# 1 on bullboards today

[knoxt]

TOP BULLBOARDS |

Company	Ticker	Views
Theralase Technologies Inc.	V.TLT	4216
PyroGenesis Inc	T.PYR	3465
BCE Inc	T.BCE	2823
Gatekeeper Systems	V.GSI	2700
HPQ Silicon Inc	V.HPQ	2337
Artis Real Estate Investment Pref Shs Series E	T.AX.PR.E	1920
Veren Inc	T.VRN	1808
Baytex Energy Corp	T.BTE	1489
Bombardier Inc.	T.BBD.A	1419
BlackBerry Ltd	T.BB	1401

[chry200030]

This is about to get interesting.  We could see $2 in 2025 and a double each year going forward  until a buyout. All eyes wll be on TLT for a while..

[Infinity]

We are not going anywhere, will be treading water till we get the BTD.  I am hoping that TLT has applied for it already.  IMO BTD will be the Catalyst to move and be seen by the Big Boys

[patience69]

Of course you do realize that we could get AA or even full approval without BTD?

[menoalittle]

There's a way of looking at the data that probably makes Ruvidar more likely to receive AA than BTD... but I'm not thinking or saying it would be before BTD.  Just, more likely when they eventually do apply for it. (Hopefully sooner in 2025 rather than later in 2025.) 

[bmk211]

Without BTD, AA.   would we be required for a phase 3 trial?

[enriquesuave]

No PH3.  Would have to wait for entire data set on 85-100 patients and aim for full standard approval. End of 2026-early 2027.  That's the worst case scenario ( other than no approval)but would still end up  to be amazing!    

[menoalittle]

I don't believe you have that right, enriquesuave.  My understanding is they aren't actually that far away from having what they need to apply for AA, and are aiming to do so sometime in 2025.

[enriquesuave]

I agree.  I was just responding to bmk.  If we don't get BTD or AA, unlikely IMO, but possible, then we would still not have to do a PH3 but would have to complete PH2 for full approval.    

[Infinity]

bmk,  you have a valid question.  I truly believe no one on this board can answer that question unless he/she have insider information.  IMO FDA is biased and the odds favour the BIG Pharma.  We  are just a pest  trying to share more of the Big Pharma PIE!!.  

[Infinity]

Just take one example of Theranos. FDA approved them.  Try and convince me they are unbiased.  Here is more information on Theranos.  Theranos raised more than US$700 million from venture capitalists and private investors, resulting in a $9 billion valuation at its peak in 2013 and 2014. The company claimed that it had devised blood tests that required very small

[Longholder99]

Infinity are you suggesting that Theralase has misled its investors and the FDA by presenting false data for consideration for approval much the same as Theranos did?  A very serious allegation and I hope supportable with factual information if those is your point? 

[Kingpin68]

I think the point on Theranos is that the FDA got duped big time. How? Some form of bias in their assessment? That was only about 10 years ago, and quite an embarrassment for the FDA.

[Kingpin68]

Actually, FDA only approved one finger stick test for Herpes. Nothing else was FDA approved. I should have done a simple search before taking Infinity info at face value ...

[Longholder99]

Not too many bashers have much more than rhetorical scare tactics too post here.  If you've been around long, or can read, you can label their submissions for what they are fairly quick.