Post by
MarcusA on Apr 28, 2021 3:10pm
TO ALL LONGS: Take back control!
Dear Fellow-Longs,
this is getting out of hand. So, here are 5 things about ignoring (scrolling by or using the ignore-button):
1) Ignoring will make them run dry. They feed on opposition. Don't work for them by giving them an inch of ground, i.e. a single reply.
2) They are not here to learn, so don't argue. (Tunnel or low-grade anyone?)
3) Ignoring is not acknowlging claims. They only win, if we let them dominate the board.
4) Ignoring is saving you time and other resscources, which you can spend to send me videos of cute puppies or for quality time with your family, friends, pets or cars.
5) Finally, ignoring doesn't do any damage to your account. It might even help with the SP, if followed collectively.
Take back control!
Waffels' link about bashers was an eye-opener, especially the last part about dealing or rather not dealing with them.
Comment by
StockAudit on Apr 28, 2021 3:42pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
fordster on Apr 28, 2021 3:58pm
Read Stockzorgs recent post on Tuo. (He been reading Tud board) One thing I'll say emphatically: We have some serious talent on these boards....too many to list. Thnx to all of you guys.
Comment by
MarcusA on Apr 28, 2021 4:15pm
Yes, StockAudit and Fordster, it is not hard to spot those who are really and thankfully contributing and that one learn from - and those running in vicious circles. Let's focus on what brought us here in the first place.
Comment by
fordster on Apr 28, 2021 4:25pm
You're the Oxford professor....ignorance would be to go against good advice. I'm ignoring
Comment by
GoldmemberBC on Apr 28, 2021 4:18pm
How come all this serious talent can't/won't answer relevant questions as it relates to the 43-101 that just came out? Why does this serious talent insult, name call, gas light and threaten anyone who challenges their rose coloured view of this stock?
Comment by
sooner1 on Apr 28, 2021 4:40pm
If you want answers to relevant questions concerning the 43-101 why don't you contact someone at Tudor Gold rather than belly ache about the responses you receive here. I rarely post anymore because of all the static going on. If I need questions answered I contact the source. Has always served me well
Comment by
StockAudit on Apr 28, 2021 5:12pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Franschoek on Apr 28, 2021 10:21pm
Have to agree that the preliminary met work is troubling. I think my problem with it is that the report is published minus any comment from management about next steps in the process to determine if/how the gold can be recovered. Frans
Comment by
LonghandStrong on Apr 28, 2021 10:27pm
finally we have a board. Thank you FS and CSK amd GM for asking the correct questions. This is the world that Fordster, waffles, SM1, highonlithium etc live in I think https://youtu.be/ZOziWm_MJ9k
Comment by
cskhurasu on Apr 29, 2021 11:27am
That's right. Acquirors hire consultants to vet their deals to protect board and management. The consultant's job is to see if there is a red flag or fatal flaw before any real time and money is spent on due diligence. Based on what we know now, the metallurgical issues could be that flaw. At the very least a buyer would want to see the full met report and run additional tests.
Comment by
fordster on Apr 29, 2021 6:51pm
He's ignored...but I sure did enjoy this reply...came from left field. His calculations got a good laugh I learned later that night. Thanks for this.
Comment by
fordster on Apr 30, 2021 9:42pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
LonghandStrong on Apr 30, 2021 9:45pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Krammer000 on Apr 30, 2021 9:51pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy