Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Big FISH CIRCLING

[GoldLovaa]

hahahahhahahahahahah Teuton fully funded by tudor. Oh wait can I borrow some money from you Teuton! Now that's embarrasing

[LonghandStrong]

exactly. But, the pumpers on this board feel that it's all part of a brilliant master plan! The simplest answer is usually the correct one...... perhaps this is how it went down? "Aw man, nobody yet to fund the drill program" "Thats bad guys, all those fat options we gave ourselves will die with the share price" 'Hey Tuo, you've got 9 mill, why not chip in"

[CharlieWaffles]

Now this is something interesting L&S.  Tudor Gold Corp | V.TUD Stock Message Board & Forum | Stockhouse   I like your basic idea of using the final result then filling in the blanks in reverse.    Following your setup this is also an idea.      Common practice and if you want more info I suggest. https

[fordster]

"They" of course will claim you're delusional to advance their cause....but Waffles, I know your summarization is rock solidly dead on....well worth the read. Thanks

[rmorrow99]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[LonghandStrong]

great post waffles, lots of good info there. You've heard the saying though, 'when you look for ghosts, you find ghosts'? Also, I'm sure you've also heard of Occams razor? Isn't it just simply more likely that the stock fell to $3 cause the PP was there? Or, that both TUO and TUD agree that value and MCAP just are at where they are now, i.e. $3 per share, and that the

[LonghandStrong]

and the "big fish circling" post title, that's misleading. You should be ashamed of yourself. It implies that there are majors looking to buy this, which when we have no news of, simply is untrue. If you've ever snorkelled on a nub of reef anywhere that hasn't fished out yet their predators, you'll have noticed that big fish are always circling, wether there is anything

[LonghandStrong]

if Stackhouse let you edit posts, you could change the name of your thread to "Confirmation Bias", it would be more apt.

[Y_J]

Great post. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. In addition to the 'friends and JV Partner' PP with Teuton, I wonder if it is feasible to setup a 'friends and existing shareholders' PP for existing shareholders? Basic idea is company would obtain funds for drilling and shares would be purchased by existing shareholders who wants to increase their holding rather than short sellers

[LonghandStrong]

most of the retail investors on this board don't meet the IROC guidelines for "qualified investor" and would be excluded from a PP.

[LonghandStrong]

there are lots of links specific to the regulatory guidelines that understand this better than me (admittedly an amatuer) but a PP requires I feel a prospectus exemption, which in turn delivers a diff risk profile, viz the need for a different or specific investor class. For a share or a unit to sell on an open market it must meet much more stiff disclosure and reporting thresholds, all to keep

[Y_J]

There is an existing shareholders exemption for participating in PP. It appears there is a limit of $15,000 per year and some other conditions. Interested shareholders should get in touch with Tudor. If enough shareholders are interested, maybe the company can look into issuing PP to existing shareholders. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bcsc.bc.ca

[LonghandStrong]

cool. Didn't know that re: existing shareholders exemption. Can you post a link to source, id like to read more. $10,000,000 / $15000 = approx 700 shareholders. What price would you pay? $4? I don't know if many here would buy $15,000 worth at $4 when they could just buy on the exchange sub $3? It's pretty easy to get q $15,000 position in TUD, and if 700 were lining up at $4, our SP

[Y_J]

One idea may be to have Tudor issue the first PP of every year to shareholders at the current market price. If additional PP are required later, market price may be higher after drilling results. The objectives are to reward shareholders by allowing them a chance to increase their shares. It also makes it more difficult for short sellers to cover without buying on the open market.

[LonghandStrong]

what would be in it for tudor?

[LonghandStrong]

and how would it make it more difficult for short sellers? It would increase the float. Every private placement they do instantly devalues your shares. The hope, and I stress hope, is that they will use the $ for something that will increase value or move the prospect along, I.e. flow through (to drilling). Most PP in this space in the past has been to cover G&A to keep the company alive.

[LonghandStrong]

I don't think (and this is just my opinion) that the market would be kind if they didn't raise "smart $". A good portion of the reason why most are here for example is due to the ES placements. Dumb money is of not much value to a speculative tech or prospecting venture.

[LonghandStrong]

please I mean no disrespect in my posts to you. I love any fresh idea that isn't purely promotional in nature. There are lots of clever people on these boards, and I feel the boards are here to ask and answer questions, consider ideas, bring people together, etx Unfortunately the TUD qmd AMK board (and too a lesser extent TUO) as well as many other boards here have devolved to an American

[LonghandStrong]

the intelligent are curious, and see patterns, and enjoy debating a position that they may in fact have an alternative opinion on. The flip side of that is true as well.

[Y_J]

</br /the benefits for tudors are: they raise funds for required drilling to advance project. shares are going to shareholders who are aligned with company in wanting to increase shareholder value. what is raising 'smart $'? is it 'smart $' to sell shares to potential short sellers who makes a profit by driving your share price down? i don't have issues with short sellers as

[LonghandStrong]

also, the thesis of save Canadian mining is sound from a logic point of view, you are all missing the other side of the argument, I.e. why was the tick test removed in Canada and modified in the USA? Well, it didn't provide an appreciable increase in liquidity. Read here a brief article on why it was removed by regulators. https://financialpost.com/news/fp-street/canadian-regulator-removes

[CharlieWaffles]

I'll take a moment to reply here and try to break into sections what you've posted.        "great post waffles, lots of good info there. You've heard the saying though, 'when you look for ghosts, you find ghosts'? Also, I'm sure you've also heard of Occams razor? "   Can't easily respond here but I would say I

[LonghandStrong]

thanks Waffles, you too. Some good points made in your reply, had me old noodle nodding in several spots. Fingers x'd!

[fordster]

I'm your shark honey