Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Being played

[Sasha11]

This stocked is not being manipulated, but the glueless retail investor is being played by the insiders and their options.  Worlds largest gold discovery in 30 years, get serious!  It has to be economic first.  Tudor keeps delaying the PEA for a reason.  Very low grade in high sulphides, in a remote location, with <0.1% Cu counted as Au equivalent.  No way it will pass the PEA with the published resource.

[Krammer000]

Here we go........ lol. 

[rockport1]

Sasha, you have a point about the low grade at Goldstorm.  Here are some select intersects from a company drilling in BC from last year (just the longer decent grade assays).  Can you imagine if Goldstorm had similar grades?  Quite interesting, don’t you think?     27.0 m @ 1.67 g/t Au   85.4 m @ 1.69 g/t  or  1.91 g/t AuEq 247.5 m @ 0.79 g/t Au  or

[rockport1]

These assay results as quoated are all actually from the Goldstorm deposit drilling in 2021.  Anyone saying the deposit is too low a grade has no idea what they are talking about.  Yes, the entire resource might not be mined, but most of it will.   The Goldstorm deposit has much higher grade sections than the overall grade, which will make it very economic to mine with proper

[fairdinkem]

Rockport!, first of all,, thank you for taking the time to ferrit out these drill core numbers inre, Tud drill core.  On the other hand the Tudor Gold Treaty Creek will be an extremely big money maker.  Compare it to Fort Knox from Fairbanks AK,, or for that matter any other low grade mining Company.  Fort Knox pays TOP DOLLAR to employees, has the best health protection coverage

[Sasha11]

OK Rockport- For clarification Tudor have very low gold grade + very low silver grade + very low Cu grade = marginal total gold equivalent grade, which is all they ever really report.  Its only marginal if the economics and metallurgy are perfect to upgrade and separate these metals. If not it is uneconomic.  This is a high sulphide system so likely processing very challenged esp in this

[fordster]

You're simply not grounded in facts bro...we have similar grades,we're on the right side of the road, we have an all star team that have jumped on board (high end people don't climb aboard the Titanic) I understand now your negativity due to Seabridge...tough. Sorry bro. At least respect this board. We've been through everything and we are solid (with many many knowledgeable

[rockport1]

Sasha, I really don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.  The pit-constrained MI grade of 0.72 AuEq is fine; many profitable mines run at less than that. However, if you think that the economics of this deposit is such that it needs a higher grade, what do you think is reasonable? If you they raise the cutoff grade to 0.60 g/t, the pit-constrained MI resource is 335

[MarcusA]

[Sasha11]

I am a mining engineer and this grade is too low,  Maybe it might make it in a low sulfur environment in Nevada, but not here.  Consider the mineralogy, never discussed, the location challenges, the climate, the lack of infrastructure etc etc etc. The technical report just gives ounces.  So how many millions of equivalent (LOL) ounces without even a PEA to support it.  Just

[Jetstream1281]

We're all mining engineers here. You didn't know that? Joker......

[fordster]

I trained Ken Konkin everything he knows....unfortunately you have no credibility as my last statement. Its easy to yammer and make bold statements....once again, I'll follow the advise of Stansberry and associates, Ken Konkin, Walter Storm, Eric Sprott, Ronald-Peter Stferle, the team of Tudor and all the professionals that have proven their knowledge on this board throughout the years. I

[fordster]

Wait...youre actual stating Nevada is not high in sulfur? RED LIGHTS!!! Your no credible source as the entire section has a high sulfur content...you should visit it as with most of the pacific rim. Anyone can Google sulfur in Nevada and get the truth.

[CaptainE]

I read your post and decided to add another 1500 shares. I'm going to do the same tomorrow. Sasha you keep on crying and I'll keep on buying. Three amigos, going long bi***! 

[paydirtontario]

In order to manipulate a stock then the stock must be manipilatable in sense it's vulnerable to being played with and controlled because it's not yet ( broke out ) Sell everything and move on is easy advice but there's so much going on that the run of mill investor is missing here ?global out of control events 2001 2008 2022  listen to this video at least 3 times and if your still

[Jetstream1281]

This stock would be SO easy to manipulate right now...the other day we saw a 10 cent swing on less than 3k shares....There is no volume here so they can pretty much do what they want with it. I just wonder how many shares the manipulator(s) will be able to pick up.... Just hold.......or be ready to add....If you can't handle the pressure, just walk away and ignore it for a while. Until

[karlschranz]

I'm always glad when I find scribblers here who know more than Ken Konkin. So you are of the opinion that the companies drill into the blue and hope that a mine is feasible. You make me laugh.