Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Just my opinion

[Krammer000]

We are not a war with Seabridge. Everyone has to play nice in this massive gold sandbox. Seabridge Has worked very hard to get where they are and should be rewarded. Seabridge wants it sold. I don't have any shares in Seabridge. But if both companies work together to put both properties,where a major or majors,  into production. It would benefit both Seabridge and Treaty Creek. I personal think an alliance would be beneficial to both companies. Can you imagine a major owning the whole string of pearls? I wonder what the PEA would be on the entire string of pearls. The closer Seabridge come to production notice the better for Treaty Creek. If you look at the big picture. It just makes sense for a major or majors to buy the whole chain of pearls. Multiple generational mine. It's jaw dropping what it could be. Again I believe both companies need a alliance to get the best deal for all shareholders. The cost savings would be massive if both companies work together. 

again this is just my opinion. Any feed back would be appreciated.

[ibaru55]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[NOMOREROLLBACKS]

was this project just to stressful for Walter? I hope not.... I am believing that we will end with a contiguous huge mineralization at goldstorm .... No final edges this year is a good possibility. I want the new companies shares if our string of diamonds is taken over.. ,

[cskhurasu]

This is smart thinking, IMO. Pretium went first because it was smaller, less expensive and high grade. It is now in production which makes an SEA deal more likely. SEA  goies into production next because it is much more advanced than TUD, That would help TUD. TUD is at least 5 years and $300 million behind SEA. It's not about a concept like string of pearls. It's about getting the

[CoastalTrader]

cskhurasu - you are on the right track with a few deviations.  A Resource Estimate, PEA and PFS to be published as material information must be conducted by an indepent, professionally registered geoscientist using the publicly released drill data.  But for inhouse information, any major can have one of their geoscientist develop that same data for them.  That would allow them to

[stockzorg]

I would agree except that I just saw the post related to the Kinross acquisition of Great Bear for $1.85 Billion without even a maiden resource estimate.  So I'm wondering if larger outfits are getting a bit edgy to gobble up resources they can't find themselves. No way to tell, but the eventual Great Bear and Treaty Creek open pits could be similar in size, even though the initial