Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia... see more

TSXV:TUD - Post Discussion

Tudor Gold Corp > Redo the MRE
View:
Post by Peterc31 on May 07, 2023 6:11pm

Redo the MRE

I just signed up because something has to be said about Tudors huge, stated gold resource in BC.  The metallurgical data provided in Section 13 of the last technical report indicates the valuation of this property would be negligible, unless there are high grade pocketsCertainly no where close to 25 million tonnes.  Common knowledge in the industry is if its refractory gold in high pyrite, it would need >3 g/t Au cut-off grade (and not Au equivalent).    That’s well above the average grade of the entire property.  If you mine below that grade you lose money. The copper content is more a hindrance than a help since it doesn’t come close to producing a flotation concentrate that can be sold. There appear to be other technical and infrastructure challenges as well.  The involved professional firms should understand all this.  Maybe the resource geologists and the metallurgist who signed off have a talk to each other.  Then put out a qualifier; or else there are going to be some very unhappy late comer investors who will lose millions based on the highly misleading MRE as reported in the April 28 Technical Report.
Comment by Bentbutnotbroke on May 07, 2023 6:21pm
Thank you for that spiel....my strawberries weren't producing very well but after I put that load of cr@p on them it looks like a bumper crop is on the way.
Comment by TeckPro on May 07, 2023 7:21pm
Oh wow another anonymous basher. Of the thousands of companies this person chose us, what a coincidence-:) Thanks for your wildly inaccurate comments based on hypotheticals! 
Comment by Jetstream1281 on May 08, 2023 1:06pm
So, basically what you're saying is that your Sasha account got banned, so you had to create this one to keep on spouting your garbage....
Comment by Sasha11 on May 10, 2023 6:15am
I’m still here Jetstream and I’m not going away until I see a Treaty Creek PEA.  Laughable, that you think I’d get banned from Stockhouse for asking reasonable questions, while you hope to carry on unchallenged promoting implausible schemes.  How many of the last round of options did you get?  Most exploration firms put out a PEA after 1 or 2 million ounces, then update with ongoing ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities