Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Seabridge vs Tudor

[Jaskula]

Even though Treaty Creek may provide better opportunity long term, and project economics could be better than KSM, but overall I think Seabridge can provide better value for investors in terms of better diversification and faster pathway to production:
1. They have 5 interesting projects, with 3 of them confirmed high grade ore.
2.  KSM has all permits in place, and this is a major derisking factor.
3. Construction scheduled for next year.
4. Much lesser dilution of shares  
5. More ounces per share and most copper per share than any other major producer.

[1and1is5]

20 years in the making  and still more to go.  Hope you have age on your side 

[Jaskula]

Unfortunately that is reality in Canada, it takes 20 years to develop the project from discovery to production. The major obstacle is permitting, environmental assessment etc. I have seen many great projects that did not go anywhere because of permitting. KSM is fully permitted and ready for construction. Treaty Creek still long way to go , first PEA - 1 year, then PFS - 2 years, Environmental

[TCrelave]

Oh yes! That's why Valley of the Kings was never developed.. Thanks for reminding me about that! Btw, How long do you think it will take to build the tunnel through Treaty Creek? IMHO, the three Amigos Market Caps are justified just for being on the right side of the mountain. Best of luck to most! 

[Jetstream1281]

SEA big climb has already happened....that's the difference.

[Sasha11]

You cant compare Tudor to Seabridge’s KSM which have better grades, is not refractory gold, and can produce a copper concentrate that would sell.  I know this because I’ve read their NI43-101 economics, lightyears ahead of Tudor in accountability and corporate governance.   KSM’s been looking for a partner for years, still no takers, despite positive feasibility level economics

[Jaskula]

Too big for anyone to tbuy in. A multi partneship is possible here, with Seabridge remaining as a majority stake holder. In any case with rising gold prices, the project economics will improve hugely to the point that Seabridge will not need partners any more, and can go alone.       

[fordster]

...all just speculation- you too Sasha. Bashers bash.

[Sasha11]

if only building a tunnel was this projects problem.  And Fordster...Promoters do what?  Hint starts with "L" and rhymes with bye.  Only for today, lets talk again soon. 

[fordster]

So Sasha...if this sucks so bad, why do we have JVs in talks with KK? (Which is factual...unless you're  also calling KK a "promoter")  Your talking to a whole host of professionals that know the situation.  'There are various reason for the delay your criticizing Tudor for.  Quote from Highper on TUO BB: "Even a step out duster can crystallize

[cskhurasu]

TC is many years away from a PFS. You need a complete project design from infill drilling and detailed mine plans to a processing flow sheet and plant design, definition of waste rock and tailings facilities and years of environmental data including analysis of water runoff and chemistry, plant and animal studies, archaeology surveys and so on. Be realistic. A Preliminary Feasibility is tens of

[TeckPro]

(1) SEA needs a tunnel (behind the Mountain) which takes years and a few Billion. (2) Tudor has much better grades and perfect location. (3) SEA will need TUD cooperation $$$. (4) TUD has much greater upside by far. (5) No serious buyer would JV behind the Mountain without looking at in front of the Mountain. Common sense. 

[fordster]

Well said...that's a wrap...have a good day everyone.

[cskhurasu]

SEA will never go it alone, no matter the price of gold. You need hundreds of engineers to do a final feasibility, build the mine and operate it. There are maybe 19 gold and or copper companies that could do it and some of those are already occupied with other projects or their shareholders don't want them to undertake such a huge project. Adding ounces is not the key to getting a deal

[TeckPro]

Hey... Literally 99% of your posts are on TUD and you have already said that you own no shares. Why are you here and not on the SEA thread asking... When is the tunnel going to be finished 2028 or 2030? Are you aware that Morningstar just downgraded SEA to HOLD and has TUD as a BUY? TUD holds the KEY... remember that ok-:)

[Sasha11]

Thanks for asking TecPro, and let me tell you why I have a lot to say about Tudor.   They will be giving Canadian Junior Mining a bad reputation if allowed to proceed on this basis. I work in this business, and I don’t want to see it damaged yet again.  World largest new gold deposit, of coarse I was excited and interested, so I read the recent technical report. How did it come out

[TeckPro]

Sasha11 in reality you are an anonymous poster = a nobody. Post your real name, your employment history, and your credentials and let's see how they stack up to the present Management team. Until then you sound like a disgruntled worker who is no longer employed and has an axe to grind. Everything about Tudor is legit and they have clearly stated that a PEA is scheduled later this year, so

[MaterialsMan]

Sasha, For one thing, I don't think anyone can deny that this board is lacking for lively discussion. I do not feel qualified to make any judgement regarding the progress with TUD. However, I did pick up on your comment regarding the protection act. If you want to get a look at a company that I think is definitely skirting the NI43-101 regs., take a look at CNL. To me it looks like Bre-X in

[TeckPro]

Materials Man,  Actually all legitimate investors in the 3 Amigos welcome lively but "ACCURATE" discussion. Long investors deserve respect, and not spurious and blatantly inaccurate information that is maliciously posted by certain individuals and always at critical times. Then the share price is miraculously and illegally shorted down on an exchange that has zero transparency

[GoldInsect777]

TeckPro, I may be missing something with your point in your last sentence - what do what you believe to be trolls on an obscure penny stock forum have anything to do with institutional naked short selling? Do you really believe that a few gullible users on Stockhouse selling their shares in a company because of what they read here actually is of significant use to said short sellers?  The

[TeckPro]

GoldInsect777, Where did I say what type of investors are involved in naked short selling? My point is that anytime we get (what I consider good news since I am a legitimate investor in TUD) bashers appear and post blatantly inaccurate information. Do you believe this is a coincidence? I do not!  I specifically said that "spurious and blatantly inaccurate information that is

[MaterialsMan]

TechPro, The situation with TUD is far from being an isolated incident. There is frustration throughout the precious metals mining investment community. That applies to both juniors and seniors. Sentiment similar to yours is popping up on bullboards everywhere. It is indeed frustrating when one feels certain  that a company they have an ownership interest in is not demonstrating its perceived

[fordster]

Sounds like Sasha is getting Sea confused with Tud.

[Jetstream1281]

The reason you can't compare the two is not because of grade but because of timeline. TUD is where SEA was back in the early 2000s.  Wait until they out out a PEA and then we'll compare. You're lying about KSMs grades. I've already posted the numbers straight out of their PFS. gold and silver are higher and copper is identical on TC. Anyone who wants to look them up can.

[cskhurasu]

Someone who understands.