Post by
NamesJeb on Jul 17, 2023 7:40am
tunnel route development
Anyone have any idea on the reasoning of Tudor going after Seabridges tunnel rights? Any chance it's related to a possible offer in the pipeline and the purchaser wants everything neat and tidy?
Comment by
NamesJeb on Jul 17, 2023 7:47am
I'm unfamiliar with where exactly the proposed tunnels would have been, but have there been any recent drill holes by Tudor in that approximate area with pending assays?
Comment by
Robizounskin on Jul 17, 2023 8:37am
Seabridge have a right of way on Treaty creek but they cannot go trough an ore deposit or interfere in it’s exploration program as this will impact Tudor asset. Now that Tudor as defined a growing deposit Seabridge as to reroute the tunnel path not to disturb the ongoing exploration of Tudor.
Comment by
NamesJeb on Jul 17, 2023 8:40am
Sorry I didn't clarify, Seabridge just had a news release that Tudor has filed legal action to terminate Seabridges tunnel rights
Comment by
fordster on Jul 17, 2023 10:21am
Ain't no one going to buy out or JV with Seabridge anytime soon.
Comment by
TeckPro on Jul 17, 2023 10:56am
I've always said that from day one. TUD holds the key. No more nice playing in the sandbox. Legal matters can take a long time to play out. This won't prevent TUD from their own JV either because they are in front of the mountain, and no tunnels necessary. All IMHO, DYODD, and GLTA Longs.
Comment by
cskhurasu on Jul 17, 2023 12:10pm
Only TUD could assay it, as I recall.
Comment by
mariomiles on Jul 17, 2023 7:57am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
mariomiles on Jul 24, 2023 6:32am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy