Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia... see more

TSXV:TUD - Post Discussion

Tudor Gold Corp > Update Re Treaty Tunnels
View:
Post by Robizounskin on Jul 20, 2023 8:58am

Update Re Treaty Tunnels

From Highper post on Teuton board;

Update Re Treaty Tunnels

October 6, 2014, Vancouver, BCTeuton Resources Corp. (“Teuton”) (“TUO”-TSX-V) (“TFE”-Frankfurt)  (“TEUTF”—OTCBB)  is pleased to provide this update on the tunnels which Seabridge Gold proposes to build through the Treaty Creek property, connecting Seabridge Gold’s KSM mineral deposits with its planned mill and tailings site some 17km to the northeast.

On Sept. 29, 2014, Seabridge Gold  put out a news release which stated: “Seabridge Gold Inc. has received early stage construction permits for its KSM project from the Province of British Columbia. The permits issued include: (1) authority to construct and use roadways along Coulter Creek and Treaty Creek; (2) rights-of-way for the proposed Mitchell-Treaty tunnels connecting project facilities; (3) permits for constructing and operating numerous camps required to support constructions activities; and (4) permits authorizing early stage construction activities at the mine site and tailings management facility.”

The Seabridge Gold news release is, unfortunately, not as clear as it could be.  The rights-of-way granted with respect to the Mitchell-Treaty tunnels are prefaced  under the rubric of “early stage construction permits”, which could be read as implying  that construction permits have been given to build the tunnels (an interpretation taken by many shareholders of Teuton Resources) .  Teuton’s reading of the relevant government documents which support the approvals suggest this interpretation is incorrect.   No such construction permit has been granted.  Rather, the government simply gave Seabridge Gold a Licence of Occupation (“LoO”) along the proposed tunnels route.  Moreover, that LoO contains an important limitation which is as follows:

“this agreement is subject to the prior rights of the holder of the mineral claims 392436, 251232, 392435, 251229, 251231, 251230, 390924, 392362, 392463, 392464 and 560221;”

The mineral claims enumerated above underlie the proposed tunnel route and are part of the Treaty Creek property.   Teuton’s reading of the limitation is that Seabridge Gold must first address the prior rights of the owners of the Treaty Creek property before construction can begin.   To this end, the Company has had, for the past several years, on and off discussions with Seabridge Gold for access rights.  At present no negotiations are ongoing and no access rights have been granted.

Also, Seabridge Gold, in a letter to the Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resource Operations dated Sept. 24, 2014, agreed that it would not undertake construction along the LoO until it had received a permit pursuant to the Mines Act (British Columbia).  Under the Mines Act, a condemnation drilling report demonstrating that no resources will be sterilized through infrastructure development is routinely required as part of a mine project application.   Teuton expects that the tunnels will be considered infrastructure and will have to be drilled off to ensure that no mineral deposits are sterilized.

In addition, Teuton Resources has discovered a local precedent covering the case of  one company seeking to construct a tunnel through another company’s claims.  In the 1980’s Newhawk Gold wanted to put a tunnel through claims held by Catear Resources.   The area covered by these mineral claims is in the Brucejack Lake area, which borders Seabridge Gold’s KSM property to the east (the Newhawk Gold property is the one that is today owned by Pretium Resources and the Catear Resources’ property at that time was called the Gold Wedge). The government required that two condemnation holes be drilled by Newhawk Gold along the tunnel route through Catear’s ground.  This was done and all information, drill logs and assays, were handed over to Catear Resources.

Teuton’s position on the tunnel access rights is that permission will only be granted to Seabridge Gold after condemnation drilling has been carried out to ensure the tunnels do not sterilize any viable deposits.  Some form of reasonable compensation must also be paid by Seabridge Gold to the Company, the quantity of which will depend, among other factors, principally upon the results of such condemnation drilling.

In order to lessen the confusion on this issue, Teuton will be publishing on its website at www.teuton.com (available here) copies of the LoO and the accompanying Revised Management Plan, as well as letters written by the Company to the Ministry of Lands, Forests and Natural  Resource Operations, which explain in detail the Company’s position.  These letters include various figures and attachments, including a report by E. R Kruchkowski, P.Geo. on the Treaty Creek property and a report by geophysicist, K. Killin, P. Geo.  Also published with these documents is a proposal  by Mason on behalf of American Creek Resources (“AMK”) for sale of its interest in the Treaty Creek property to Seabridge Gold in connection with securing tunnel access rights.

Ownership of the Treaty Creek property was apportioned earlier in the year at 51% AMK, 49% TUO by the Supreme Court of British Columbia.  The company has filed an appeal of this decision.  If the appeal is successful 100% of the property could be returned to Teuton.

The Treaty Creek property is located 80 miles north of Stewart, British Columbia at the north end of the Sulphurets mineralized system which hosts the many mineral deposits of Pretium Resources and Seabridge Gold.

In other corporate developments, E. R. Kruchkowski will be taking over the role of  Teuton’s Chief Financial Officer from Amanda Mullin.

 

Respectfully:

“Dino Cremonese, P.Eng.”

President,

Teuton Resources Corp.

Comment by MaterialsMan on Jul 20, 2023 9:13am
If they can't come to a mutual agreement, the lawyers are going to have a ball.
Comment by fordster on Jul 20, 2023 9:22am
What agreement is needed? The documentation lays it out plain and simple. I believe that's the reason Tudor is doing this...read Tuetons 2014 NR previously posted from Rob and Highper. Tudor doesn't need to make a case: things are self evident.
Comment by fordster on Jul 20, 2023 9:17am
I've been reading that Rob...I think I understand why Rudi has been very defensive. It appears he's been cornered since 2014...but publicly he and all his cronies have been leading everyone to believe otherwise. That's the document Proceeds was mentioning on his post, I believe.
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 20, 2023 10:11am
So basically if there IS a deposit there, it voids the license of occupation and the ability to build the tunnel....plain and simple...
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 20, 2023 10:32am
This may push TUD to do a PEA sooner rather than later.
Comment by Countrygent on Jul 20, 2023 11:18am
  "Voids" may be an overstatement.  But it's close.  Renders ineffective might be closer.  But the Gold Commissioner may revoke in any event. if the licence isn't revoked, the permitting under the Mines Act may block the tunnels in any event ... SEA is in a jam. "Under the Mines Act, a condemnation drilling report demonstrating that no resources ...more  
Comment by Jetstream1281 on Jul 20, 2023 11:27am
Yes "void" is definitely not the correct term. You are much more articulate than I am. They will still have a license of occupation, but won't have the approval to build a tunnel on that particular stretch of land.
Comment by pfaffgau on Jul 20, 2023 11:19am
Agreed!!   SEA is going to have to do a deal?   I don't care how good their lawyers are.  IMHO
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities