Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Holy Batman

[Larry60]

Anyone notice SEA has doubled in the past 6 weeks????  DOUBLED!!!!  It added $1B of market cap!

I was very tempted to buy some last month but between lingering concerns, big exposure to 3 amigos and limited funds to splash around, i didnt pull the trigge.

Congrats to those who di.

[Jetstream1281]

Nobody here gives two hoots about SEA beyond their impact on TC....if we did we'd be over on the SEA board where we belong.

[Jetstream1281]

Our time will come and when it does, I'm predicting a lot more than a double.

[CobraShelby]

Hello Larry  Even if they have double in the last 6 week with the total ounce of gold they have if we include all metal they have = 180 millions ounce of gold with a market cap 1.9billion this give only 10.50 per ounce of gold in the ground ,  ball park , way to low for what they have ..in September  2007 they were sitting at 33.09 with 1/3 of the reserved, they have today, with a

[remucker]

gold at all time high of 2300 and this can,t even break .90 cents . they should change the symbol from tud to DUD 

[Systemtogo]

Wow this post sure didn't age well from this morning lol

[Stockmoves1]

Holy Batman we have a Gapper :)

[Larry60]

Cobra,  I hope everyone here is in for more than a double.  Im sure those in on SEA are as well.  But still, would be nice to be moving up with the rest of the market to helpp position for getting back through all time TUD highs  in the $4.50 range (Id be out before we get there short of ground breakin news) When gold is breaking ATHs day after day, people stating "our

[CobraShelby]

Hello Larry  Whatever is good for SEA is also Good for us and vice versa . The real problem for te Gold industry is Naked Shorter selling share they do not have. They are doing a really good job for many years now killing us .  

[Larry60]

Colby, I agree that what is good for SEA is good for us. Many on this board think the opposite which is absurd.  No KSm, no TC (vice versa not necessarily). Naked shorters are an issue, but not as big as many make it out to be except for the microcaps.  The real issue with the industry as that there have been no positive fund flows for several years.  The move in gold has not

[CobraShelby]

Larry  In my view for many years now, I see only on big giant mine in the area . But any deal with Seabridge and the big boy is so hard to get for 2 reasons. 1. Seabridge is so big with their 180 millions of gold including all metals , fo rthis reason it may take a        couple big boy to purchase them . 2. Mister R is  so greedy and in my view this is why he can

[TeckPro]

Yup. Hopefully their is s CEO of a large Miner that's smart enough to make a deal with TUD 1st, and squeeze the lower grade explorer behind the Mountain into oblivion. Really pretty simple! 

[CobraShelby]

Agree 100% with this statement TeckPro  Our Grade is close to Double and would be perfect for us.

[Larry60]

I hold TUD/TUO/AMK.............have held off on SEA as tempting as it has been from time to time. But to deny that SEA is not 8+ years ahead of us, is delusional.  SEA is up 100% in past 5 weeks. We're up 15% (almost all today).  Sea could be in production in 2+ years.  We could  be in production in 10+ years.  Its the reality of building a mine. SEA getting into

[GuruNN]

Larry, still don't trust a word you say.  When you talk about "us"... it is so ridiculous.  You are a laughing stock and paid by Seabridge, nothing else.

[Jetstream1281]

I also agree with you Guru...if you follow the posts back and look at their content, bias, jargon, etc I still swear he and CSK are one and the same...

[Larry60]

Anyone who doesnt buy into the irrational pumper nonsense is automatically the same person on the is board!!!  Rudy thinks that is hillarious!!!!! I assure you im not CSK.  But he often puts forth well reasoned arguments. And CSK is uprfont about holding SEA.  Congrats CSK on the 100% move on SEA in 6 weeks.  I hope it is just the begining for you. And I hope the amigos

[cskhurasu]

Thanks Larry60 for your kind words on SEA's stock performance. It was pretty ugly not that long ago. 

[fordster]

Man, if you're not an "insider with Seabridge".... "thanks for the kind words for SEAs stock performance "...who the heck says that. I'm seriously wondering if you're actually Rudy.

[Larry60]

I'm flattered by your Paranoia!!!     Rudy thinks its hillarious!!!!!!!!!!! Trust me, I have way more exposure to TC than you do my friend. As for my posts:  I like to stick to facts and well reasoned opinions.  I know that doesnt always sit well with pumpers.  But it does with real investors

[Jetstream1281]

I agree with you there actually Larry, but if you look at where the real money was made on SEA, it's when they put out their PEA/PFS....thats when the 10 baggers happen and we are nearing that point here....

[Larry60]

Agree that the real upside comes with PFS - between PEA and full FS (FS is viewed as a buzz killer).  Low grade assets need to demonstate economics to be taken seriously.  High grade has the luxury of FOMO e.g. Great Bear. But a PEA would be as start.  It would at lease give a thumb nail sketch of what migh be viable size and cost wise.  PFS will  then firm that up.

[Jetstream1281]

When's the last time I bought into the irrational pumper nonsense? I back my posts up with numbers and links that anyone can verify for themselves.... I'd argue that your posts are more more well reasoned than CSKs....he's a complete idiot with no form of reason whatsoever.... I merely see similarities between some of the arguments and jargon you both use that nobody else does.....he

[cskhurasu]

SEA is in substantially started construction now. But their best estimate is to be built and in commercial production is 6 years. They have not yet completed a final feasibility because they want their partner to be involved in it. I think the mine building is 4 years at least. Whatever SEA is, add at least 7 years for TUD.

[Robizounskin]

Don’t forget that SEA is only allowed to do some preliminary work at the tunnel portal on their claims in the center of Treaty Creek and not on Tudor claims around the portal.  Access surface road to the portal on Tudor claims is allowed but Tudor have the right to used it as it become a public road on crown land.  The road will have to be rerouted if it’s interfering with Tudor

[cskhurasu]

SEA's latest disclosure of their communication with the BC government indicates they think no concessions need be made to TUD for the MTT and they have complete priority to do what they need to do for the MTT on TC claims due to their reserves. We shall see if they are right in their interpretation but you can be sure it was vetted by the best available legal talent.

[fordster]

If your right, then have them pay us off for sterilizing the entire TC...no problem as that's what you must do. Kind of funny though, officially they say you don't have that permit and the conflict should be resolved between them It does not seem like your info is consistent with the public info that was released. Why doesn't Seabridge (you) release or post those here for us all to go

[Jetstream1281]

You can go back and forth with these idiots all day long....and I have.....butnit doesn't get anyone anywhere....ill just let reality do the talking...and the reality is that SEA has no permitted access to their site right now...until that changes, they have no mine....and likely no JV partner.

[alpha74]

SEA should think about how much they have to pay TUD if they want to build their tunnel and they have to build it if they want a mine!

[Larry60]

I would think they have a worse case scenario number in mind already.  THey are also likely working on various routing alterations that will obviously add to costs as well . THe ministry has made clear, and it is in law with the legialation and regs, that they will make a determination on what, if any, compensation will be required.  They have been explicit about this and in the last go