Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

imagine how the institutional investors at SEA must feel

[highper]

Tudor isn't the only company whose shares are undervalued in the market place. Just over $23 bucks is all the market is giving for a company with a total of just about 160 million ozs of gold resources in the ground...  Never mind the Heck, they don't even have a 100 million share float. Seabridge management has to be under serious pressure to get something done, by its big money institutional investors. Never mind the 65 billion pound copper resource eh?

Kerr-Sulphurets-Mitchell

British Columbia, Canada

The world’s largest undeveloped gold project by resources (88.3M oz M&I plus 71.5M oz inferred). The property received B.C. Environmental Assessment certificate in July 2014 and federal environmental approval in December 2014. The 2022 PFS shows significantly improved economics compared to previous studies.
--- taken from seabridge gold web site

[Signman]

Highper I will admit I have never looked for myself at SEA results over time probably because I was not interested in being an investor. But I have always heard they were a strictly bulk tonnage deposit. With no high grade. I could be wrong but is that correct? If so, what Ken has found would indeed have the institutional investors maybe worried they picked the wrong horse. Though not entirely

[highper]

each of my seabridge shares is backed by just under 2 ozs of gold resources and what 655 pounds of copper resources ..don't forget the silver.... seabridge should easily be trading at plus $60 a share but management is playing tiddly winks trying to chince its way out of coming up with an alternate tunnel route which has to be a contributing factor to being stuck in the doldrums in terms of