Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Teuton Resources Corp V.TUO

Alternate Symbol(s):  TEUTF

Teuton Resources Corp. is a Canada-based exploration stage company. The Company is in the business of acquiring, exploring and dealing in mineral properties in the province of British Columbia, Canada. It owns interests in more than thirty properties in the prolific Golden Triangle area of northwest British Columbia. The Company’s property portfolio includes, Treaty Creek Property, Eskay Rift... see more

TSXV:TUO - Post Discussion

Teuton Resources Corp > Nations Royalty started trading
View:
Post by rockport1 on Jun 22, 2024 3:57pm

Nations Royalty started trading

The Nations Royalty (NRC) Golden Triangle based streaming company began trading yesterday.  They have ported the royalty streams, given to First Nations for mines in their territory, into NRC. All five streams are from GT based mines or future mines: Brucejack, Premier, Red Mountain, Kitsault, and notably KSM.

In their corporate presentation they have revenues from KSM beginning in 2029.  Seems pretty optomistic to me, given that the MTT is supposed to take five years to build, and they don't yet have the constructions permits. 

Note Frank Guistra and Rob McLeod are involved in NRC.

I suggest reading the corporate presentation available on their website if interested.  https://nationsroyalty.ca/home
Comment by NOMOREROLLBACKS on Jun 22, 2024 9:50pm
CAUTION RE GUISTRA COMPANY INVOLVEMENTS. OREA MINING was suddenly delisted, not halted , from the TSX exchange  one day with no warning.. I was the last buyer completing that day. I had many millions of shares and thought they were OK.....  ... Orea.....   I was wrong.... Don't get ripped off!!!!!! 
Comment by rockport1 on Jun 24, 2024 7:25pm
Nomore, thanks for the heads up. I wasn't following Orea.
Comment by rockport1 on Jun 23, 2024 2:39pm
One implication of this NRC royalty on KSM, is it highlights another group with a major incentive to see KSM go forward; i.e. the Giustra / McLeod group, in addtion to the Seabridge group. Arguably, it is another influential group that would like to see the MTT get approved to the detriment of the Treaty Creek group.  It's plausible that they are putting whatever pressure they can on the ...more  
Comment by rockport1 on Jun 23, 2024 2:59pm
67% (US $146 million) of the NPV of NRC is attributed to KSM.  Again, huge incentive for the NRC group to exert influence to see KSM move forward. Also, I forgot to mention that Sprott Resource Streaming is also waiting for their silver and all metal NSRs on KSM to kick in.  So Tudor is facing significant, financially powerful groups that would like to see Seabridge obtain the MTT ...more  
Comment by CaptainE on Jun 23, 2024 7:46pm
They better get on that partnership/JV before any tunnel happens. At 22 odd kms the cost would be astronomical. Shorter tunnels have bankrupted companies in the past and left portals to nowhere behind them. It's going to take some very deep pockets and most of these majors are heavily invested in developing current projects that are still years away from production. Not saying it won't ...more  
Comment by NineLives on Jun 23, 2024 9:37pm
Captain, from what I've read on SEA over the last couple of years, used to be an investor, they haven't picked any particular deposit within the KSM, that's a waiting game as they find a JV partner. In the mean time they continue to add resources, it does keep growing, that's for sure but they've halted all further drilling, apparently no need anymore. It's JV time, and for ...more  
Comment by TCrelave on Jun 23, 2024 10:47pm
Hi!, lots of great content 'mostly' lol! To your point, I do wonder what a 'Production Decision' would look like.  Could TUD after a PEA say, "We're going to Production!"?  Walter Storm and others with KK have been deeply involved with 'going to production'. KK is on record estimating that TC would be a mine by 2030. CS600 certainly looks capable by ...more  
Comment by rockport1 on Jun 23, 2024 11:01pm
A production decision would normally take place after a bankable feasibility study.  Tudor might be able to sneak it forward slightly.  But it should have to take place after the exploration for the mine plan is complete; the original option agreement probably specifies the exact details. I think it is unlikely they could mine by 2030; that would be a surprise to me.  If the mine ...more  
Comment by rockport1 on Jun 24, 2024 1:13pm
I said a production decision would normally take place after a bankable feasibility study, however, there are exceptions. Our neighbor, with a massive project in KSM, has not yet completed a bankable feasibility study, but they essentially already comitted. They have applied for "Officially Started" status to ensure the permits remain valid at KSM, and have spent hundreds of millions ...more  
Comment by Larry60 on Jun 24, 2024 3:39pm
rockport, agreed that SEA is a good example. theyve spent around $500 million the past few years alone moving through feas. A solid prefeas report is not out of the question, but we are still a couple of years away from that at a minimum (and I dont mean PEA when I say prefeas).  If you had enough workd done, and had environmental and other permits, within the realm of possibility... ...more  
Comment by Larry60 on Jun 24, 2024 11:29am
No credible project of size would ever make a production decision without a bankable feas in place. I would assume that the JV agreement specifies that a completed feasibility is required to before a decision can be made.  Ive posted standard verbiabe in the past of what you would usually see in the decision and requried agreement amongst parties to the JV. As SEA has demonstrated, as have ...more  
Comment by CaptainE on Jun 24, 2024 8:40am
Thank you for the response NL. That's what I thought but I didn't look at technical reports, just the easily accessible stuff on their website. I think a focused plan on one of the deposits would be key for a major. Found a few silly spelling mistakes while reading and really seemed like reading one big sales pitch from a used car salesman. Yes the deposit is big, grades stil low, cost ...more  
Comment by NOMOREROLLBACKS on Jun 24, 2024 2:14pm
ONCE BIT, TWICE SHY!!!!!!! 8
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities