Ucore Rare Metals Inc. V.UCU

Evidence

[Dragonsmyth7]

Dear Bob & Pip,
I am back from brother's.  Long drive and boy am I glad the number of charging point has increased.  It used to be that if one owned an electric car one had to plan trips very carefully.  The car is great for running around town but for long trips one can have range problems that is not good for the stomach.  Getting old mean helping with family work do's.  One get to direct the work not do the work.  So the younger ones can learn.  Besides the cold and the wet bother the right leg way more than they use to.

Okay Bob and Pip, just what evidence would it take to satisfy you that RSX is as Ucore says it is?  
How about fraud?  Saying that RSX is faster, cheaper and greener than SX is not a forward looking statement.  So if it is a lie then it would be fraud.  If Ucore says that there is independent testing and there was not, then it would be fraud.  If Ucore says that RSX separates concertrate to oxides and it does not then that would be fraud.  If Ucore says that it can separate heavy REEs and it can't then that is fraud.  Now, if Ucore says that it will be produce oxides by frist quarter of 2025 and it does not than that is a forward looking statement and not fraud.

So what evidence would be enough?
Dragon

[VeritasBob]

Ucore ccould start by releasing the independent report of testing done in late 2021, and let's see what it says. Of course, any testing done then has been superseded by demo plant activities in the past year. Whether Ryan is fooling himself or trying to fool otherd I don;t kknow, but I don't trust Ryan's summary of the independent test report. Still think it's ppssible that Ryan

[PipinoCuevas]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[Rodtipup]

dragon there's only one way Ucore can prove RSX . It has to be done through a head to head test RSX vs STD solvent extraction. All the parameters need to be 100% equal  such things as time temperature volume etc so in saying that and remembering back on Ucore news releases they are running a parallel system to prove RSX there is no other way. 

[VeritasBob]

That's idequate. Comparison needs to account for all set up time and maintenance time, not just speed when running. Maybe RSC has more set up or maintenance time? Comparison should be RSX vs. good SX implementation, becuase demo plant's SX might be crummy. If a new runner claims to be the fastest, you don't judge them by whether they beat gandma in a race, they need to race against

[PipinoCuevas]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy