Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Western Wind Energy Corp V.WND

TSXV:WND - Post Discussion

Western Wind Energy Corp > $3 - $ 4 article
View:
Comment by peter75 on Nov 30, 2012 9:13am
read that as well on about 5 different producers sites
Comment by agrossfarm on Nov 30, 2012 9:22am
That article is only part of the original Bloomberg article, which foolishly touts WND as the most expensive acquisition because it uses trailing 12 months EBITDA rather than forward 12 month EBITDA as the basis of comparison. Acquirors buy future earnings (or EBITDA), not past earnings. And past 12 months EBITDA for WND does not include operating results for most of its capacity, which only came ...more  
Comment by peter75 on Nov 30, 2012 9:31am
Agros I know its hard to speculate but if and when wnd is aquired by a like company do you foresee  a firm dropping all sorts of savings through elimanation of duplication right to the bottom line I calculate it could be as much as 9 to 12 cents a year
Comment by agrossfarm on Nov 30, 2012 9:36am
An acquiror is not looking at earnings, IMO. They are irrelvant. They look at EBITDA, OPEX, revenue escalator clauses, what existing loans will remain, and what loans can be paid off and replaced by lower-cost loans, taxes and tax liabilities. 
Comment by Nakate on Nov 30, 2012 9:45am
I'm getting annoyed at this open jawed wholy moley "Thats the most expensive valuation for this kind of company yet" like it does not deserve to be treated like a normal company but some kind of loser wanna be company cause  you ain't cool enough to be included in the real company list.
Comment by agrossfarm on Nov 30, 2012 9:52am
The author of the Bloomberg article probably has his/her email address on the story, if you want to write and set the person straight. Perhaps they will update the story and get it right next time. But if you complain without providing factual justification for making the article better, they just dismiss you as a disgruntled shareholder.  On the other hand, perhaps you can think of the ...more  
Comment by babloo on Nov 30, 2012 11:47am
i did send her an email..she is quote the hottie.... check her twitter page
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities