Comment by
Aprilk on Dec 28, 2012 9:59am
Trust me adding 6000 at the open (note I posted the bid before it went up ) was an easy choice IF all we do get is the $3.18 that alone would bring me $2400 I happen to have 50,000 shares though and think $3.50 will be nice : )
Comment by
bakken13 on Dec 28, 2012 10:39am
I will admit, April, that you have far more credibility that 95% of the posters here..........well, maybe 99% Some of these guys are simply loons.
Comment by
Aprilk on Dec 28, 2012 10:46am
and the reason I never put you Bakken on ignore is I would rather hear your input . In between the insults your wisdom shows lol
Comment by
peter75 on Dec 28, 2012 10:49am
I finally figured it out, April and Baken are married and probability is the son!
Comment by
Aprilk on Dec 28, 2012 11:02am
lol Good one ! So I think Peter is $4 , a few others $5 , Prob $3 , Agross is still doing fundamental projections and the sane folks $3.18 -$3.50 area
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 11:05am
JSJ please reply to April's latest post please. I am trying to be a nicer person going into 2013 :).
Comment by
jonathanstjohn2 on Dec 28, 2012 11:13am
April you need to get a new ougii board. Keep it in the same drawer as your other, ahem, accessories. In fact get new accessories too. You deserve them.
Comment by
peter75 on Dec 28, 2012 11:16am
here is my calculation and it is final ATTENTION ALL SUITORS HERE IS HOW YOU VALUE WND April said 3.18 Mart says 5.00, I say 4.00 reversion to the mean is 4.06 This is the sell price, Do I make myself clear? FYI wnd was at 3.75 in 2004, and in 2008, perhaps we use 3.75
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 11:24am
Perfect JSJ. Many thanks. Ching.
Comment by
jonathanstjohn2 on Dec 28, 2012 11:30am
Thanks Peter. That makes sense to me! The middle road. By the way I just called IR to see if April bloviated some information (14 days) out of them. They're closed till Jan 2. So it looks like she is sliming us again for no reason. Very anti-social.
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 11:30am
Peter I thing you mean regression. And, in fact, we were close to 4.40 in 2008 before the meltdown, no fault of WND's. Does that change your calculation ?
Comment by
peter75 on Dec 28, 2012 11:41am
ching do not get confused with simple linear regression because you would have to do more than one sapmple reversion to the mean is the coming back to the centre or mid point It only hit 3.75 on a spike in 2008 If you have a graph that shows 4.40 I stand corrected but for now you are wrong
Comment by
eljoro on Dec 28, 2012 12:04pm
To quote Carl Perkins: "I was THERE when it happened..." Ching doth speak the truth. I cleared my ignore list this morning. Took me several hours to wade through this message board after that. Good times. Cheers, El Joro
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 12:11pm
I doth thank you, El Joro. After all, my reputation was at stake :). I wonder what Jeff is sipping on now. Lucky schm_ck.
Comment by
CanackShack on Dec 28, 2012 12:18pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
peter75 on Dec 28, 2012 12:20pm
google does not show the spike
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 12:39pm
Peter, maybe googling is not the best source of stock info, I don't know. I was just asking you to trust me and re-do your calcualtion based on the spike in june 2008. I did happen. I will be nicer in 2013. I will be nicer in 2013. I will be nicer in 2013.............
Comment by
ching819 on Dec 28, 2012 1:14pm
CS, point being, his calculation was based on wrong data. I was asking him to please re-do his calculation based on CORRECT data. What part of that don't you understand, YOU TERMINAL TWIT ?????? I will be nicer in 2013. I will be nicer in 2013. I will be nicer in 2013....
Comment by
CanackShack on Dec 28, 2012 1:27pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy