Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc V.YFI

Alternate Symbol(s):  KPIFF

Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc. is engaged in Spectrum Slicing technology for residential and commercial markets. The Company develops advanced wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) silicon solutions, access points, and intellectual property (IP) licensing designed to meet the service needs of service providers and their customers. Its physical layer Spectrum Slicing allows a frequency band to be divided... see more

TSXV:YFI - Post Discussion

View:
Post by VerifiedUser69 on Jun 26, 2022 1:09pm

Timelines

If the validation is held within the details and Edgewater doesn’t own any of that data from the tests, what can we release? If our a tier one customer really wants this technology and sees it as their leg up on the industry or a new technology to market why would they release it unless we had achieved any milestones required in whatever agreement like an MOU might lay out. Don’t laugh to soon. These tests I imagine cost a fair bit of money 200,000 300,000 500,000? I don’t know if we paid for those. What was that pre-payment all about at the beginning of the year 109,000 was it 106,000? I’m sure it’s not in any major providers interest to share that data with anybody which compromise their own goals.

Any service provider could simply just pass on our technology and continue using what seems to be successfully adopted technology we all see globally. Why would they bother with additional tests proof of concept pilots exploring a deeper relationship with an MOU. I think it would just be plain as day already that this technology that was tested of Edgewater’s that it just didn’t meet the criteria they were looking for. Sure their process might just say let’s keep digging a little more a little more a little more. But at some point they either walk away or they keep digging or start building.

A long term funding strategy as Andrew quoted which they wish to execute I think was point 2 or three and there are 3 to 12 month timeline.

Is Global Foundries our “Establish a production partnership with a leading silicon organization”?

“Secure a commercial MOU with a Tier 1 Customer” along side or soon after announced long term funding strategy I would say is is pushing our chest closer to the finish line.

And as I said I don't even think it matters if we get an order or how early pre-revenue we are I think if we get a substantial order being the Market the we are in with such few other semi conductor companies I think the company would get scooped up very quickly and another 1-2 years.


I remember Steven Andrew saying in the fall of 2018 that this whole thing wasn't going to happen overnight. Two years ago in February Andrew had said 24 to 36 months in that podcast or webinar that the company did well we're definitely pushing past 24 months and it looks like will be exceeding 36 did we miss one of the business cycles for these set top boxes or access points? Are we still in the same business cycle?

Comment by leodevoe on Jun 26, 2022 9:51pm
LOL. No one Tommy, I mean no one, spends more time publicly trying to convince themselves that yfi is about to bet out than you do. No matter what transpires you find new fodder to bolster your belief that someone is just about to hand them the big win. How you think Yfi is going to execute a long term funding strategy is a mystery. They have big problems raising short term funds and they have no ...more  
Comment by VerifiedUser69 on Jun 27, 2022 10:02am
And on the other  end, nobody tries harder to convince the opposite tjen yourself.  i'm definitely critical about the weird communication and lack of follow up on old events but why release news on our failures? No other comkany does it or would ever do it.  many other CEOs would've packed it in a long time ago and maybe never would've worked another day if they knew ...more  
Comment by Proceeds on Jun 28, 2022 12:41am
The last Bill has left the till. So u can't reach the Bill.
Comment by Pandora on Jun 28, 2022 9:42am
A different start for the day -- 123,500 shares traded up half a cent in the first ten minutes. Different anyway!
Comment by leodevoe on Jun 28, 2022 12:52pm
Yep, company's rarely publicize failures. My point is how you gloss over them and immediately find something new that points to huge news ahead. You've bounced form one to another for 7 years.  Which leads me to my second point, this thing you keep saying about hitting milestones. Like getting someone to make chips. Engim had a chip deal. Yfi had a chip deal. That's what you do ...more