Post by
SamDiego on Aug 25, 2023 12:53pm
Leo, poor branding, & the product & messaging don`t jive
Leo, including all of his prior usernames has had a clear motive for posting and his only means of executing this is through the content of his posts. In other words he is the brand, and how you assess and value that brand is soley based on the content of his posts. Hence, if his motive is to convince you to divest yourselve of your shares then his success will not only be dependent on your trust in his intentions, but also in the fact that the content of his messaging is a worthy fact. In other words, he is the product and he establishes the brand.
Now, if any marketer is worth his salt he will be humble enough to heed the words of Robert Burns who lived in Scotland. The country leo is choosing to visit. So, what did good old Robbie once say?
"O wad sum pow`r the giftie gie us, to see urselves as ithers see us."
So, if logic dictates that Leo wants you to believe in his personal brand and his messaging, would you not think he would recognize the significance of ensuring you first view him with some trust. So, tell me, how well do you think that worked for him when he constantly changed his username without admitting to it? Personally, my immediate reaction was that whatever this dude is up to he surely is not the brightest candle in the window? What do you think his friend Royal thought? Good move leo?
And what was leo`s technical evaluation regarding any of YFI`s technology? Please tell me, as I have yet to see evidence of it? It all adds up to dismal branding and market failure of leo to me? Should you be surprised that this anonymous bullboard forum represents his last chance for relevancy?