Comment by
crazytimes on Jul 04, 2024 2:50pm
Yukon minister says cyanide found in creek near mine spill, after firm issues denial (citynews.ca)
Comment by
SidelineSam on Jul 04, 2024 3:08pm
Whho verified the cyaidine? Where is the technical report... is it bar talk or pr spin? The kiddies in Grazzy Narrows Ontario has a merc spill for decades and the Billy-da-Davis boyz suggested it was natural occurrrring. Where the tecknical report? Who prepared it...? Was it written on a napkin at a bar and suddenly gone missing? When the iii.to dam broke.. what was the settlement?
Comment by
Zibo510 on Jul 04, 2024 2:55pm
Those samples were taken immediately after the slide, I wonder what samples going forward are going test. Not looking good.
Comment by
crazytimes on Jul 04, 2024 2:59pm
Zibo.... You were 100% correct about what they would say. When I saw the conference it was almost exactly what you said was going to happen. Just wanted to give you your props. Just my opinion.
Comment by
SidelineSam on Jul 04, 2024 3:21pm
It's a not-a environmental disaster-ero until the CBC tells the plebes that it is so. Has CBC reported it... are funds flowing from Pubic Safety yet?
Comment by
crazytimes on Jul 04, 2024 3:02pm
RK...What you are saying is not what MDY is making a point about.. MDJ is 100% correct! Please reference the company news release after the halt and then compare it to what he just found. Just my opinion.
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:06pm
Ok fair - but they are not saying these are critically elevated levels or anything like that. They are just saying they are elevated from baseline. I think anger should be directed at the company (for seemingly insisting CN has not left the site) and not at the gov, which is doing its best here. So i think the anger is misguided....
Comment by
crazytimes on Jul 04, 2024 3:11pm
rk... totally. That's what I am so confused about. If the FN got these results last night, how can you they make that claim today after a halt no less? Wt f am i missing? Just my opinion.
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:38pm
Totally. Anger though should be focussed at the company. The gov clearly is not (and ought not be) focussed on the investors....
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:39pm
(And i am 100pc positive the company knew in advance what the gov tests showed)
Comment by
Zibo510 on Jul 04, 2024 3:41pm
I am surprised that the SP hasn't tanked on this news. Tomorrow's trading will be interesting, when US markets are open again.
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:45pm
This is the part I'm not understanding. What part of this news is in any way a surprise? I'm being utterly sincere in my question. I don't think there's a surprise here at all.
Comment by
crazytimes on Jul 04, 2024 3:48pm
Zibo... what amazes me is no one is even talking about the 50 - 60 meter tall sheer that needs to come down? How many tons of material is in that? Just my opinion.
Comment by
SidelineSam on Jul 04, 2024 3:50pm
Holy CT... 50-60mt of tall sheer.... No tryck question, just a clear answer to: Is there cyanide in the pad or not? __ yes __ no
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:50pm
He called it 'sub vertical'. Answer: a lot
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:52pm
he said the rain might bring it down. Then he talked about his university professor.
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 4:22pm
Not crazy at all - it might be a heli drop avalanche bomb - this is common practice (for avy control in the winter.
Comment by
Zibo510 on Jul 04, 2024 4:25pm
Maybe they could get the air force to bomb it he,he
Comment by
steve55 on Jul 04, 2024 3:56pm
bring it down shorters,i will buy more.
Comment by
nincompoop on Jul 04, 2024 4:16pm
If you have money to give away...send it to me.. Cognitive Dissonance is raging with this one...
Comment by
rkhosla on Jul 04, 2024 3:22pm
I get 79mil gallons (264gallons per m3 x 300,000)
Comment by
HoneyBadger77 on Jul 04, 2024 3:26pm
Sorry, you are correct, it's 79,251,615 gallons. My apologies. HB77