Victoria Gold Corp VITFF

Looks like VG was trying their best to ensure

[mdjbrown]

water modelling was accurate at Eagle.   Lots of engineering firms involved.


https://emr-ftp.gov.yk.ca/emrweb/COMM/major-mines/eagle-gold/emr-mml-eg-hlf-2023-annual-water-balance-modeling-report.pdf

"4.2 Stochastic Modeling

All stochastically generated climate datasets are presented on a weekly basis. There is a 0% probability of overflow from the In-Heap Pond at any point in 2023 for the HLF model results presented herein. As noted above, this model does not incorporate all the site-wide water management strategies, specifically surrounding the Events Pond which is captured in the site-wide water balance and water quality modeling."

[HuskySW]

Saw that too.  Thanks.  So with all this 0% in 2023 what the heck happened in 2024, was the heap pushed (hard as in productivity) , who instructed who to do what will be the question? Report intro. "This document has been prepared by Forte Dynamics Inc. (Forte) on behalf of Victoria Gold Corp. (VGC) for the Eagle Gold Project. The purpose of this model is to provide guidance on

[mdjbrown]

I think the notion that VG wasnt getting the required inspections can be put to rest, as it looks like engineers were all over the site for annual inspections. Whatever happened between June 2023 and June 2024 could be recorded as it is possible the 2024 inspection was also completed considering July 1 was the deadline. 4.3.1 Stability Inspection 4.3.1.1 Engineer of Record Physical Stability