Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Voltalia Ord Shs VLTAF

Voltalia SA is a France-based holding company engaged in the renewable utilities sector. It designs, develops and operates electric power stations in numerous countries, such as France, French Guyana, Brazil, Greece and Morocco. The Company generates electricity using a variety of renewable energy sources. These include wind, water, biomass and solar power. In addition, Voltalia SA specializes... see more

PINL:VLTAF - Post Discussion

Voltalia Ord Shs > Question regarding feasibility study
View:
Post by Goldflow on Oct 09, 2012 8:26pm

Question regarding feasibility study

Anyways as they said in the pre-feasibility study VTR should produce on average 300,000 oz/year. Question is why is their production target so high?

 

Company's like Rubicon Minerals plan to start off their full production at 180,000oz/year, which I think VTR should follow also.

 

300,000oz/yr is too much. They should start off at producing below 200,000oz/year, ON TOP of selectively mining the high-grade ore first. This will they'll have a shorter pay-back period and then later ramp up production to 300,000oz/year and mine the lower grade ore when they have the funding.

 

Any thoughts on this, or if anyone spoke to IR or Kevin regarding this? Thanks.

 

Regards,

Angry Long-term Shareholder

Comment by VentureTrader1 on Oct 09, 2012 8:29pm
I agree.  You should e-mail the company, though, and get their opinion on this, and why they don't do this as a way of reducing the up-front investment.
Comment by ALLEN4 on Oct 09, 2012 8:51pm
I think we have seen since the pre-feasibility study came out, indications that Volta is looking at a step by step phased in approach to developing the mine.  That seems to be a new trend amongst developers recently.  I think with the feasibility study it will be an entirely different animal with some different options to proceeding.  But my understanding is that usually gold mines ...more  
Comment by VentureTrader1 on Oct 09, 2012 9:05pm
'...the more we produce the more we make'.  True, but first they have to get the money, otherwise production stays at 0.
Comment by gold_diggers1 on Oct 09, 2012 11:01pm
Goldflow & VT1 - I did email the CEO asking about the possibility of staging development in order to reduce initial capex.   His answer is - yes, VTR is looking at the staging, but won't know whether it's possible for at least another couple of months. . GLTA  
Comment by Goldflow on Oct 09, 2012 11:36pm
Of course, the more we produce, the more we make. But the problem is the market is way to volatile and risky right now, so as the saying goes, "something is better than nothing." I'd rather produce less and make less, so that I can get financed, than not get financed at all and produce zero.
Comment by Goldflow on Oct 09, 2012 11:38pm
And to add to that - I believe the main reason why we are tanking in share price is because people think we are worth nothing. Yes we have tons of gold in the ground, but whats the point in having gold in the ground if you can't even pull it out? Therefore, we need to prove to the market that we CAN pull something out. We don't need to start pulling out a lot of ore, just enough for the ...more