Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Voltalia Ord Shs VLTAF

Voltalia SA is a France-based holding company engaged in the renewable utilities sector. It designs, develops and operates electric power stations in numerous countries, such as France, French Guyana, Brazil, Greece and Morocco. The Company generates electricity using a variety of renewable energy sources. These include wind, water, biomass and solar power. In addition, Voltalia SA specializes... see more

PINL:VLTAF - Post Discussion

Voltalia Ord Shs > How to Save the Venture Exchange
View:
Post by calico on Jul 09, 2013 6:36pm

How to Save the Venture Exchange

The solution to ensuring the survival of the TSX Venture exchange is quite simple.  Ban shorting, all shorting of any kind. That's it, nothing more, nothing less.  If shorting were not allowed, a company could stand on its own merits and attract investors who would step in and buy shares, assured these shares would not be ripped to shreds by shorters.  Shorting is unbridled theft, plain and simple. 
If I had $10,000 in a bank account and anyone was allowed to withdraw from it, without charge or penalty, what do you think would happen?  The account would soon end up with a zero balance, I would be out $10,000 and those who robbed my bank account would be enriched by the amount they had stolen.
Similarly, let's say I own 10,000 shares of Company A, which I bought and paid for at say 20 cents a share, using $2,000 of my own money.  Broker B steps in and sells 10,000 shares of Company A which he didn't buy at let's say the same 20 cents per share.  That broker just pocketed a cool $2,000, without investing a penny.  Did he get my permission to sell my shares.  Of course not. Do I get compensation for those shares Broker B just stole from my pocket?  Of course not. Is this fair?  Of course not.  Is that broker every required to buy back those shares?  I'm not sure, but I doubt it, because the fox appears to be watching the henhouse.  The fox won't stop stealing hens until someone shoots it. Even if broker B does buy back those shares, he's already reduced the value of my 10,000 shares of Company A.  Furthermore, he can sell another 10,000 shares, and another 10,000 shares, and another 10,000 shares in Company A, ad infinitum, forcing its shares to plummet.  What do I, the legitimate investor, get in return?  Nothing but grief and worthless shares.
Shorters would have us believe that shorting helps create what they euphemistically call "an orderly market."  That is a self-serving myth, used to shore up their baseless argument and keep my money and your money flowing into their pockets.  Shorting creates a very uneven playing field, tilted grossly in favour of the shorters.  One would think that some small advantage would be given to buyers who actually pay for shares; instead, the overwhelming advantage is given to sellers, especially shorters.  It's as if the brokers view the negative impact on the Exchange as mere collateral damage in their pursuit of profits from shorters and high-frequency traders.  Perhaps they don't realize that if the Exchange is destroyed, there will be no profits for anyone.  Shorting has, to use the words of Watergate's  Sam Ervin, "no redeeming social value".  In short, shorting should be banned completely from the Venture Exchange.

p.s. I know this isn't a Venture stock, but it's also been slammed by shorters, so the same fair play rules should be implemented.
Be the first to comment on this post
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities